SC stays Calcutta HC order in favour of Tata Steel

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 21 2013 | 4:48 AM IST

The Supreme Court today stayed the Calcutta High Court's order permitting leading steel-maker Tata Steel to go in for arbitration over a payment dispute with supplier Hitek Industries.

A Bench comprising Justice Altamas Kabir and Justice A K Patnaik also directed Tata Steel to file a reply to Hitek Industries' appeal against the order of the Calcutta High Court permitting the steel company to go in for arbitration over their dispute.

The apex court's direction came over a petition filed by Ranchi-based Hitek Industries, which had an agreement with the Tata group firm to manufacture crash barriers and supply them back to Tata Steel.

Crash barriers, or guardrails, are barriers on roads designed to prevent vehicles from leaving the roadway to improve road safety.

Tata Steel had entered into an agreement with Hitek Industries on February, 2004. As per terms and conditions, the Ranchi-based firm lifted raw material from Tata Steel's Jamshedpur-based plant and would manufacture crash barriers and supply them back to it.

However, a dispute later arose between the parties and Tata wanted to refer it for arbitration. However, the supplier opposed the move and submitted that since the agreement between them was terminated long ago, there was no question of arbitration.

According to the petition filed by advocate Pawan Kumar, the firm claimed that there was no failure on their part in making delivery of crash barriers.

Following this, Tata Steel approached the Calcutta High Court, which initially dismissed its plea. However, Tata Steel later approached the High Court again, which this time allowed it to go in for arbitration.

This was opposed by Hitek on the grounds that the Calcutta High Court has no jurisdiction, as the dispute was in Jharkhand.

It further submitted that both the firms were situated in Jharakhand and the transaction also happened in that state.

Rejecting the contention, the High Court said that as the firm had submitted a report of delivery of crash barriers in Kolkata, it had jurisdiction over the matter.

This was challenged by Hitek Industries before the apex court today, contending, "The High Court of Calcutta has erroneously allowed Tata Steel's application for arbitration, holding that part of the cause of action has arisen within the jurisdiction of it."

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 10 2010 | 9:45 PM IST

Next Story