Singh brothers get 6-month jail term in Fortis-Daiichi Sankyo case

When the brothers did not pay the arbitral award enforced by the Delhi High Court, Daiichi had filed a special leave petition in the apex court in 2018

#2016@shock&awe: Headline Grabbers of 2016
While analysts have maintained a cautious stance on Fortis Healthcare, the hospital group said on Thursday that it would be seeking legal advice for the future course of action
Bhavini MishraSohini Das New Delhi/Mumbai
4 min read Last Updated : Sep 23 2022 | 6:30 PM IST
The Supreme Court on Thursday awarded a six-month jail term to Malvinder Singh and Shivinder Singh, former promoters of Fortis Healthcare, in a case filed by Japanese firm Daiichi Sankyo and ordered a forensic audit of the Fortis-IHH deal. 

The apex court also remanded the matter to the Delhi High Court while continuing the stay on the IHH open offer.  

The Singh brothers were sentenced after civil detention proceedings for failing to comply with the court’s orders to pay an arbitral amount to Daiichi. The top court had registered a ‘contempt of court’ case against them in 2019, asking why they should not be punished.

Shares of Fortis Healthcare fell 15 per cent on the bourses after the verdict.

Malaysia’s IHH Healthcare had, in 2018, acquired a 31 per cent controlling stake in Fortis by paying $1.1 billion in a bidding process overseen by an independent board. 

This set off an open offer to acquire another 26 per cent of Fortis shares. The open offer was not pursued as Daiichi had filed a plea against it. Daiichi had challenged the Fortis-IHH deal to recover the Rs 3,600 crore arbitration award it had won in a Singapore tribunal against the Singh brothers.

Former Ranbaxy promoters Malvinder Singh and Shivinder Singh were accused of concealing information regarding wrongdoing in the company when they sold a majority stake in it to Daiichi in 2008. The Singapore tribunal had in 2016 awarded Daiichi Rs 3,600 crore in damages.

Filing a petition against the Singh brothers and Indiabulls, Daiichi alleged that both parties had pledged 1.7 million shares of Fortis Healthcare, held by Fortis Healthcare Holding, despite the apex court forbidding it.


When the brothers did not pay the arbitral award enforced by the Delhi High Court, Daiichi had filed a special leave petition in the apex court in 2018. The deal between Fortis and IHH was signed in August 2018. In December 2018, the SC stayed the IIH open offer.

When the Singh brothers were selling Ranbaxy earlier, the company faced an investigation by the US Food and Drug Administration and the US Department of Justice. The Singapore Arbitration tribunal had found the brothers guilty of making false claims and fraudulently misrepresenting and concealing the probe by the US into Ranbaxy when Daiichi bought a 34.82 per cent stake for $2.4 billion in 2008. In 2013, Daiichi sold Ranbaxy to Sun Pharmaceuticals.

On February 15, 2018, the apex court allowed banks and other financial institutions to sell Fortis Healthcare shares pledged with them by the Singh brothers, before August 31. The court had also forbidden the Singh brothers from pledging any more shares in the company.

While analysts have maintained a cautious stance on Fortis Healthcare, the hospital group said on Thursday that it would be seeking legal advice for the future course of action.

“We understand that the proceedings before the Supreme Court have concluded with certain directions and the suo-motu contempt has been disposed of. We will go by the directions of the Supreme Court and will be seeking legal advice regarding our future course of action,” said a Fortis spokesperson. The spokesperson added that they remained committed to the core purpose of patient care, and that they would keep all stakeholders “informed” as required.

Kunal Randeria, analyst with Edelweiss, said the overhang on Fortis continues. “The SC seems to have taken middle ground. While it seems unlikely, forensic audit increases the risk of unknown skeletons coming out of the closet. Fundamentally, we remain positive on the stock given its strong operating performance and calibrated expansion plans,” Randeria said.

Meanwhile, IHH Healthcare informed the Malaysian bourses that it was awaiting a written judgement of the Supreme Court of India.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :Singh brothersFortis HealhcareBS Web ReportsRanbaxy Daiichi SankyoReligareDelhi High CourtSupreme CourtDaiichi SankyoRanbaxy

Next Story