A Singapore arbitration court recently imposed this fine after it found the Singh brothers guilty of concealing information while striking the deal with the Japanese company.
Daiichi filed an appeal in the Delhi High Court asking for an interim order to secure the Singh brothers' assets equivalent to the extent of the award amount, Rs 2,562 crore, decided by the Singapore arbitration court. In addition, Rs 1,000 crore has to be paid as interest and lawyers' fees.
In its petition, the Japanese company expressed apprehension that the brothers would dispose their assets and take them out of India by the time the court arrived at a final decision on this award.
"We have an imminent fear that there may be various alienations (asset sell-off) by RHC Holdings in case there are no protective measures provided by the court. We request you to ask the respondents (Singh brothers) to issue a statement of safeguard and security," said Gopal Subramanium, appearing on behalf of Daiichi Sankyo.
The Singh brothers have a majority shareholding in RHC Holdings, a private limited company with assets of around Rs 10,000 crore. Fortis Healthcare and Religare, which are listed companies, are controlled through RHC Holdings.
Justice V Kameswar Rao, who presided over the proceedings in Delhi High Court, said he needed to be sure that the award was secure. He did not issue a formal order after Kapil Sibal, who was arguing for the Singh brothers, told the judge any such court order to issue a formal statement of assurance would adversely affect the listed companies. He said since these two companies were listed, there was no need for apprehensions of a quick asset sale. "They (Daiichi Sankyo) have shown no evidence whatsoever which can be considered as basis for their apprehension," he said.
In response to queries from Business Standard, the RHC Holdings spokesperson said it could not offer any comment because the matter was sub judice. The stocks of Fortis Healthcare and Religare did not show much movement on Tuesday, increasing by 0.12 per cent and decreasing by 0.04 per cent, respectively.
In 2013, Daiichi had launched the arbitration proceedings in Singapore, alleging that the Singh brothers had concealed and misrepresented critical information concerning US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Department of Justice (DoJ) investigations into Ranbaxy in 2008, when the Japanese major acquired a controlling stake in the company.
Consequently, the arbitration court awarded Daiichi Rs 2,562 crore through a 2-1 majority order. Justice AM Ahmadi, former Chief Justice of India, gave the dissenting opinion dismissing all claims of the Japanese company.
| CASE HISTORY The troubled timeline of the Ranbaxy-Daiichi deal |
|
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)