The order of June 10 is in reply to a petition filed by Punjab State Power Corporation (PSPCL) and Rajasthan’s distribution utilities on the issue.
The state utilities had complained that Sasan directed the Western Regional Load Despatch Centre to regulate their supply as they’d defaulted on payment to the company. The utilities were also contesting the commissioning date of the first unit of Sasan and the compensation arising out of it. Rajasthan owes Rs 94 crore and Punjab Rs 142 crore to SPL, said company sources.
“The principal amount (excluding the late payment surcharge) outstanding against Rajasthan utilities and PSPCL shall be paid in four equal monthly instalments (the dates are then specified, the latest by early September),” goes the order.
CERC has directed SPL and the other parties to settle the issue amicably. In case of default in payment on its directions, “SPL will be at liberty to act in terms of the RPS Regulations, read with the provisions of the PPA”. RPS or regulation of power supply regulations, as prescribed in the power purchase agreement (PPA), entitle the power producer to regulate supply, if the procurers don’t pay.
Officials in the Madhya Pradesh government said the state does not have any pending amount to SPL and was getting supply, in line with the PPA. Reliance Power won the tender for the Sasan UMPP by quoting a rate of Rs 1.196 a unit in 2007. SPL was supposed to sell power for the first two financial years at 70 paise per unit and then at Rs 1.19 a unit. Early commissioning would entitle it to Rs 1.19 per unit payment. This early date of commissioning was the basis of three-year tiff between the states and SPL.
The payments mentioned in the latest judgment were the outcome of the order, this March, of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (Aptel) on the commissioning date of the first unit of SPL. The order entitled SPL to Rs 1,050 crore as the compensation amount from the procurers. Reliance, in a statement in March, had said, “SPL is to recover the unpaid amount of nearly Rs 850 crore from the procurers. It would also be entitled to nearly Rs 200 crore of carrying cost as per the PPA.”
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)