The DTH market is set to sizzle

Explore Business Standard
Associate Sponsors
Co-sponsor

But Zee's Dish TV is unfazed by Doordarshan's Rs 160 crore venture which is much smaller than its Rs 500 crore operation. Dish TV is enjoying the advantages of the first mover in the DTH market. It has also signed up 1.5 lakh paid subscribers.
"In the current financial year we are looking at another one million subscribers," says Gagan Goel, who's been assigned the task of growing the Dish TV business. He admits that the project has moved slower than expected in the first year since it was launched in October 2003. "First, it was a new concept that needed to be explained to people. Secondly, we were busy putting the infrastructure (dealer network, call centre, subscriber management system) in place," he says.
Zee appointed 5,000 dealers to push its set-top boxes. It offers the boxes at Rs 3,990 and the basic bouquet is priced at Rs 114 a month. It has also introduced a monthly installment scheme to finance the set-top box.
Zee first looked at "cable dry" areas, defined as remote places without cable TV. Consequently, Dish TV is available not only in India's remote corners such as Leh, Laddakh, Kargil and Drass but also on board Indian Navy ships.
Says Star's Mukerjea: "Zee has a semi-urban strategy. It's not a bad strategy considering that of the 85 million TV households, 45 million are cable & satellite while 40 million have no cable. If you price it right, you can reach some volumes outside the main cities." Star, however, is looking at the nationwide market, he adds.
Not everyone is impressed by Dish TV's performance. A former senior Zee executive argues that to succeed in rural markets, you need to be successful in the cities as well. "Besides, in rural India, Doordarshan could turn out to be the more trusted brand," he adds.
He thinks that Dish TV is squandering its chances. "For the last one year, it enjoyed a 100 per cent share of voice but has not been able to do very much," he says.
Media marketing men also point out that Dish TV has not managed to create a buzz around its brand, though it was the sole DTH service provider for almost a year. "The problem lies in its marketing and content strategy," says one media marketing expert.
Dish TV also was disadvantaged by the fact that entertainment channels Star Plus and Sony refused to join Dish TV's DTH platform.
The marketing issues may be resolved soon. To create awareness of its DTH services, it has employed 150 vans and equipped them with a Dish TV antenna, a set-top box and a television set. The vans, on a cross-country tour, offer a taste of digital quality transmission to potential consumers.
It's also turning its attention to the "cable frustrated" and "cable content" (people looking for premium content and digital quality viewing) markets in cities.
Jawahar Goel adds that Dish TV has some high-impact marketing initiatives up its sleeve for the festival season, when people are in a mood to spend money.
Though he refuses to provide details, he admits that Zee's DTH service will be bundled with high-end television brands at consumer electronics shops. Dish TV will add 30 new channels by November.
Yet the big threat for everyone remains Star, which is expected to bring superior content to its Rs 1,600 crore DTH venture "� if the government clears it. The government is apparently linking the Tata-Star application for a DTH licence to Star's refusal to join the Zee platform.
The government wants to include a "must carry" clause in the contracts it signs with DTH licensees. This will force Star and Sony to join Zee's DTH platform. Says a top information and broadcasting ministry official: "We want to add a "must provide" clause so that platforms become non-discriminatory. As broadcasters fight among themselves, we need to safeguard the commonly viewed channels."
Mukerjea believes that the government has three reservations about the Tata-Star application. First, it has asked Star to supply its channels to everybody.
He argues that this is contrary to the concept of competition and asks how, if all three platforms look identical, does Star compete, except in terms of price. "Internationally, there is no precedence for such a "must supply" clause where a broadcaster has to supply (content) to all the platforms. This is a sure-fire way of killing competitive offerings," he says.
Secondly, the government seems to be worried about whether the Tata-Star venture will become a monopoly, considering the combined strength of the Tatas and Star.
"DTH is all about consumer choice. And if you give a choice, where is the question of monopoly," asks Mukerjea. Lastly, the government apparently fears that Star will eventually acquire the Tata group's 80 per cent stake in the venture over a period of time. Says Mukerjea: "We've told the government we will do everything according to the law of the land."
As Jawahar Goel admits, Star has the financial muscle as well as the international experience to successfully run a DTH venture. Yet the longer the government delays granting Star a licence, the longer Doordarshan and Dish TV have to get their DTH act together.
Even if the Tata-Star venture gets a DTH licence, it may take a long time to put up its infrastructure, a lead time Zee and Doordarshan can fruitfully exploit. Mukerjea says that Star has not sourced set-top boxes or done anything else since it has not obtained a letter of intent for its project.
The battle for the DTH market has not yet been really joined, but everyone realises that the stakes are high "� at least a million households every year, according to Mukerjea. So when will Star join the fray? Over to information and broadcasting minister Jaipal Reddy for an answer.
(With additional reporting by Palakunnathu G. Mathai in Mumbai)
First Published: Sep 22 2004 | 12:00 AM IST