Personal data protection Bill may lead to UK, EU data adequacy deals

Under the new draft DPRP bill put out for public consultation, the government has proposed free cross-border flow of data with "friendly" nations, significantly easing its earlier stance

Data privacy: Govt to wait for Srikrishna panel's report before framing law
Data secure status was a key demand of India when it was negotiating the India-EU trade deal before it fell through in 2013
Asit Ranjan Mishra New Delhi
4 min read Last Updated : Nov 20 2022 | 10:43 PM IST
India may find it easier to derive data secure status by negotiating data adequacy agreements with the UK and the European Union (EU) once the digital personal data protection (DPDP) Bill is passed in Parliament.

Under the new draft DPDP Bill put out on Friday for public consultation, the government has proposed free cross-border flow of data with ‘friendly’ nations, significantly easing its earlier stance on data localisation.

India being the largest hub of data outsourcing business, owing to growth of the information technology (IT) and business process outsourcing sectors, handles big amounts of sensitive and personal information of people around the world. Even without data adequacy agreements, Indian companies process a lot of sensitive data from the EU and the UK by including standard contractual clauses in their agreements between the two parties in line with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) requirement, data secure status is expected to bring in more business for Indian IT and IT-enabled services companies.

Data secure status was a key demand of India when it was negotiating the India-EU trade deal before it fell through in 2013. However, the EU had refused to give the status to India pointing out no data protection law in India, which was one of the key reasons why the trade deal could not be sealed. Both sides have resumed negotiations for a trade deal after almost a gap of nine years.

Pralok Gupta, associate professor at the Centre for WTO Studies of the Indian Institute of Foreign Trade, said although the draft DPDP Bill is a step forward in terms of easing cross-border data flow requirements, the exact contours of data transfer will depend upon the requirements to be mentioned in the government notification allowing data transfer to specific countries.

“In the context of current free trade agreement (FTA) negotiations, if India’s FTA partners are notified as countries to which the transfer of personal data can happen from India, it will help these negotiations as cross-border data flow is a major demand by many FTA partners in these negotiations,” he added.

In a recent survey of stakeholders by the UK’s Department for International Trade, respondents raised concern about the barriers to trade brought about by data localisation requirements in India, and the differing standards with regards to data protection and data security.

The European Parliament in a recent report on EU-India future trade and investment cooperation asked both parties to consider providing “interoperable data flows” between the jurisdictions in total compliance with the GDPR on the basis of an assessment. It also invited India to align its Data Protection Bill with the highest internationally recognised standards on data protection and privacy rules.

An industry expert said the negotiations with the UK and the EU for data adequacy agreements have to be done outside FTA deals, although they will be important elements in the digital trade chapters of the trade deals.

“A data adequacy agreement with the UK will pave the way for a similar deal with the EU as the UK’s GDPR is closely aligned with that of the EU’s. The differences between India’s DPDP and the EU’s GDPR could be bridged later while notifying the rules,” the official added.

Rupa Chanda, an expert in services trade, said a data adequacy deal with the EU will be much more difficult to negotiate than the UK as they would seek the Indian law to be fully aligned with GDPR.

“Since the financial data is a big chunk of the outsourcing business, the data localisation norms by the Reserve Bank of India may also be problematic while negotiating these agreements, even under a liberalised cross-border data flow regime,” added Chanda. 

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :data protectiondata protection lawsdata securityUKEuropean UnionAI and Digital data securityDigitalisationDigitisation

Next Story