BBC's Delhi bus rape documentary stirs fierce debate

The documentary instantly came under fire when an excerpt was aired across TV channels.

Anisha Dutta Mumbai
Last Updated : Mar 04 2015 | 5:27 PM IST

Don't want to miss the best from Business Standard?

Israeli-born filmmaker Leslee Udwin's came to India two years ago to capture and explore the thoughts of the rapists behind one of the most brutal and talked about crimes in 2012, the Delhi gang rape.  The 57-year-old Udwin was given permission to interview one of the rapists, Mukesh Singh, inside Tihar Jail. Little did she know at the time that her film – due to be aired this weekend – would set off a raging debate in India. 

The documentary instantly came under fire when an excerpt was aired across TV channels. In it, Singh is seen making misogynistic statements claiming that a girl is more responsible for her rape than its perpetrators. 

"When being raped, she shouldn't fight back. She should just be silent and allow the rape. Then they'd have dropped her off after 'doing her', and only hit the boy," he says in the documentary, referring to the fatal gangrape of Jyoti Singh in a moving bus in December 2012, and which sparked massive protests across the nation over the lack of women’s safety and rights.  

“It was an Arab spring for gender equality .... A cry of ‘enough is enough’” writes Udwin, who stayed away from her family for the two years of making the film, in a piece for the Guardian. “.... They were protesting for my rights and the rights of all women. That gives me optimism. I can’t recall another country having done that in my lifetime.”

Politicians, however, have bickered over how Udwin got permission for the interview. Home Minister Rajnath Singh has sought a detailed report from Tihar jail Director General Alok Kumar Verma on why the no-objection certificate was granted, reportedly by the Home Ministry in July 2013 when the Congres-led UPA government was in power.

A restraining order has been obtained against the interview's telecast stirring a huge debate on whether the documentary should be aired or not. 
The main argument against the documentary being aired is the claim that it hurts Indian sentiments and has insulted the victim and her family. As was to be expected, social media mirrored the sentiment with the hashtag #NirbhayaInsulted and #IndiasDaughter. 

Supporters of the telecast say that it is necessary to expose the patriarchal mindset that prevails in the country, and which blames women even for violence inflicted by men. 
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 04 2015 | 3:05 PM IST

Next Story