Al Zarafa had collected Rs 19.5 lakh from each nurse who sought for overseas assignments in Kuwait. The government fixed service charge was Rs 19,500 only. Misleading the nurses, Uthup Varghese, managing director of the company had collected huge sums, that comes to the tune of roughly Rs 230 crore, CBI sources said. CBI and the Enforcement department had collected Rs 4 crore from the office of Al Zarafa and also confiscated several documents. Adolphus had favoured them despite his knowledge about the illegal deeds of the company, CBI said.
When interrogated, staff members of Al Zarafa said that Adolphus had received Rs 3 lakh from Uthup as bribe. He is a native of Kollam in Kerala and is working under the ministry of Overseas Indians Affairs. CBI sources said that they will interrogate him further for more evidences.
CBI had already issued a look out notice for Uthup Varghese who is absconding. Reports said that he had left to Kuwait when CBI raided his office and residence. The agency also sought Interpol help to snatch him.
On Friday, Kerala High Court dismissed an anticipatory bail petition filed by the main accused Uthup Varghese. The court has also directed him to surrender before it. Al Zarafa agency had made an agreement with Kuwait Health Ministry to recruit 1200 nurses. According to government norms, only Rs 19,500 can be taken as service fees from a person. But the agency took Rs 19.5 lakh from each person. In this way, the company had ilegally amassed Rs 230 crore. After illegally collecting such a huge amount, the agency forced them to give in writing that the collected amount was only the mandatory service charge of Rs 19,500.
Earlier, the Income Tax Department had found that the recruitment racket had pocketed Rs 110 crore from the job aspirants. The amount was collected without giving any receipts to the applicants. One of the applicants had furnished a complaint with PoE about the illegal practice of collecting huge amount by the recruitment agency. PoE forwarded the complaint to the agency, which in tu
rn, allegedly threatened the complainant and forced her to withdraw her complaint. The case was registered against the PoE and the agency as per section 13(1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, sections 120(b) and 420 of IPC and section 25 of the Emigration Act.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)