Court rejects Salman Khan's plea to club 2 cases agst him

Magistrate Chandra Kala Jain rejected Khan's plea to club the two cases and listed the matter for hearing on March 10 for defence to produce evidence

Salman Khan
Press Trust of India Jodhpur
Last Updated : Jan 29 2014 | 6:59 PM IST

Don't want to miss the best from Business Standard?

A local court today rejected actor Salman Khan's plea to club two cases against him lodged under the Arms Act and the Wildlife Act and directed him to continue recording his statement in connection with the first case.

Chief Judicial Magistrate (Rural) Chandra Kala Jain rejected Khan's plea to club the two cases and listed the matter for hearing on March 10 for defence to produce evidence.

The actor had requested the court to club the two cases, one under Arms Act and the other related to poaching of blackbucks in Kankani on the intervening night of 1-2 October 1998, on the ground that both are related to each other.

In his statement in the court, Khan said he had no arms with him in Jodhpur and they were in Mumbai.

"I had called for those arms from Mumbai to Jodhpur only after the Forest Department asked me," he said.

The actor also told the court that he had not indulged in poaching and that the investigation officer and forest officer had fabricated a case against him.

After recording his statements, the court deferred the matter to March 10.

Earlier, Khan had moved an application in the court pleading to club the two cases (arms act and wildlife act) and carry out the hearing of both of them together, staying the recording of statement of accused in the Arms Act case.

In his application, he had argued that the matter under the Arms Act had reached the stage of recording statement, whereas the same was yet to begin in the poaching case, in which the arms in question had been allegedly used by him.

"So, he had pleaded from the court to club both the cases for future hearing and stay the accused statement recording until the other matter of poaching reached the same stage," public prosecutor Upendra Sharma said.

Khan's counsel Hastimal Sarswat said, "Our plea was that if the verdict of the arms case comes earlier, it may affect the proceedings of this case under Wildlife Act as both are related to each other.

"So, we wanted the statement recording in this case to be deferred but the court disallowed our application," Saraswat said.

Khan, who had landed in Jodhpur on Wednesday morning, had appeared in the court at about 11:00 AM amid strong police bandobast and had to remain in court till 4:00 PM during the arguments on the application followed by the recording of his statements.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 29 2014 | 6:25 PM IST

Next Story