Delhi HC refuses to hear submissions on surge pricing

A petition was filed by taxi service provider Magic Seva Private Limited against taxi aggregators earlier today

Image via Shutterstock
<a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-248648887.html" target="_blank">Image</a> via Shutterstock
Sayan Ghosal New Delhi
Last Updated : Jul 22 2016 | 4:30 PM IST
A special bench of the Delhi High Court heard submissions related to compliance of its previous orders on a petition filed by taxi service provider Magic Seva Private Limited against taxi aggregators and the Delhi government today. Magic Seva had earlier approached the high court seeking a remedy to flagrant violations of the City Taxi Scheme 2015 by taxi aggregators, which lays down maximum taxi fares that may be charged in the national capital.

The petitioner had also raised additional concerns regarding safety of passengers using such taxi aggregator services and critiqued both the service providers as well as the government for repeated failures to address such issues. At the end of the previous hearing on the petition, the court had issued orders to all taxi service providers directing the submission of comprehensive lists of driver details in the NCR region for police verification of driving licences and criminal antecedents.

The aggregators were also directed to submit details of vehicle registrations and insurance policies to be verified by the transport department. In today's hearing, the parties informed the court as to what actions have been taken by them in compliance of the prior orders. After these initial submissions were made, the petitioner counsel attempted to begin regular arguments on the remaining issues, which the court refused to entertain at this juncture.

"If substantial compliance has been achieved,then something good has happened already. We cannot hear the entire matter at this time at the cost of poor citizens. The rest can be heard in due course before the regular bench," said Justice J R Midha, reminding the advocate for Magic Seva that the present hearing was scheduled only for ensuring that previous directions had been followed.

The court then listed the matter before the roster bench for regular hearing on 30th August.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 22 2016 | 3:06 PM IST

Next Story