Delhi HC stays proceedings against Sonia's aide in DA case

Vincent George had approached the High Court challenging the July 18 order of the Special Judge

<a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-133683230/stock-photo-scales-of-justice-gavel-and-books.html" target="_blank">Gavel</a> image via Shutterstock
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Aug 26 2013 | 4:12 PM IST
Congress President Sonia Gandhi's close aide Vincent George today got some relief from the Delhi High Court which stayed trial court proceedings against him in a 12-year-old disproportionate assets case.

Justice Veena Birbal stayed the proceedings on a plea filed by George challenging the trial court order summoning him as an accused in the case.

"The proceedings before the special judge are stayed," Justice Birbal said.

Also Read

Appearing for George, senior advocate Neeraj Kishan Kaul cited several Supreme Court judgements and said, "It is a fit case for stay of proceedings. CBI has filed a closure report after they could not locate anything in the case. This is a pure case of harassment of my client."

On the last date of hearing, Justice J R Midha had recused himself from hearing the case without citing any reason.

George was supposed to appear before the special court on August 30.

George had approached the High Court challenging the July 18 order of the Special Judge rejecting CBI's closure report and summoning him as an accused in the case, saying there was sufficient material to proceed against him.

"Final report filed by CBI is not accepted. Further, it is held that sufficient material is available on record for proceeding against Vincent George for the offence punishable Under Section 13(1)(e) of Prevention of Corruption Act (PCA) relating to possession of assets by a public servant disproportionate to known sources of income.

"He be summoned as an accused for offence punishable under section 13(1)(e) of PCA, 1988, for August 30," the trial court had said in its order.

An FIR was registered against George in 2001, when the NDA was in power, by the CBI in which he was alleged to have been in possession of disproportionate assets from November 1984 to December 1990, a charge trashed by him.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 26 2013 | 3:55 PM IST

Next Story