A bench of justices Gita Mittal and Anu Malhotra observed that the convict was 23-year-old at the time of crime in 1999 and if the appeal would have been heard expeditiously, even if the order of life sentence had been maintained, the appellant would have long ago been able to seek executive pardon.
"On a consideration of the entirety of circumstances, given the serious nature of the offence committed by the appellant, so that he is given an opportunity to reform and make useful contribution to society and not waste his existence, we consider it appropriate to reduce the sentence imposed by the trial court of life imprisonment, to a sentence of rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten (10) years...," the bench said.
It, however, upheld the Rs 5,000 fine imposed on convict Sanjay.
Besides modifying the jail term, the bench directed the Superintendent at the Tihar Jail, where the convict shall be incarcerated, to consider an appropriate programme like correctional courses through meditational therapy for 40-year -old Sanjay.
The order came on an appeal filed by the convict against the trial court's September 2000 verdict by which he was held guilty of raping a 16-year-old girl.
As per the prosecution, the convict had raped the girl on March 22, 1999 after confining her in his room. Soon after the incident, he was arrested. He was released on bail by the high court in December 2006 when his appeal came up for hearing before it.
The convict had undergone a period of seven years, seven months and 27 days of incarceration, before he was released on bail.
Taking a lenient view, the high court said if it was feasible for jail authorities, the man should be given educational opportunity, vocational training and skill development programme to enable a livelihood option and an occupational status.
It suggested post release rehabilitation programme for the convict well in advance before the date of his release to make him self-dependent.
"Furthermore, it is directed that a bi-annual report is submitted by the Superintendent, Tihar Jail, to this court till the date of release, of the measures being adopted for reformation and rehabilitation of the appellant," the court said in its 26-page judgement.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)