DMK files review petition against top court order upholding 10% EWS quota

Plea seeks an open court hearing in the matter on the ground that it affects a lot of citizens in the country

Supreme Court, Benami Act
A Bench comprising Chief Justice of India (CJI) U U Lalit and Justices Dinesh Maheshwari, S Ravindra Bhat, Bela M Trivedi, and J B Pardiwala delivered the judgment on November 7
Bhavini Mishra New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Dec 05 2022 | 8:11 PM IST
The Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam(DMK) filed a review petition against the Supreme Court’s judgment which had upheld the Constitutional validity of 10 per cent reservation for the economically weaker section (EWS) among forward castes in government jobs and colleges across India.

The plea sought an open court hearing in the matter on the ground that it affects a lot of citizens in the country.

A Bench comprising then Chief Justice of India (CJI) U U Lalit and Justices Dinesh Maheshwari, S Ravindra Bhat, Bela M Trivedi, and J B Pardiwala delivered the judgment on November 7.

Of the five judgments delivered, Justices Ravindra Bhat and Lalit gave dissenting judgments.

Reading out the verdict, Justice Maheshwari had said that the 103rd constitutional amendment for the EWS quota was valid and did not violate the basic structure of the Constitution. Reservation, he said, is an instrument of affirmative action to ensure an all-inclusive march toward the goals of an egalitarian society.

“Reservation is an affirmative action measure not only for the socially and economically backward classes but (also) for any disadvantaged section. Therefore, reservation solely on an economic basis does not violate the Constitution,” he had observed.

The DMK, in its plea, stated that the said judgment overrules the ruling passed by the nine-judge Constitution Bench in Indra Sawhney vs Union of India which has authoritatively pronounced that reservations cannot be based on economic criteria.

The plea said the EWS verdict legitimises discrimination by opining that exclusion is vital for achieving the desired results for a particular target group. “It fails to consider the fact that the intended target group, that is the EWS, was created by excluding the similarly placed economically weaker sections of the SC/ST/OBC community who have remained to be economically weaker due to rampant, systemic discrimination and oppression over the years,” the petition said.

The Supreme Court committed an error apparent on the face of the record by holding that abolition of reservations will abolish the caste system and lead to an egalitarian society, the plea further said.


One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :DMKeconomically weaker sectionReservationEWS quotaDMK presidentSupreme CourtChief Justice of IndiaCJIIndian constitutionbackward classes commission

Next Story