HC allows RInfra to amend defamation suit against AAP

AAP alleged that the company was overcharging consumers in collusion with MERC

Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Mar 07 2014 | 7:24 PM IST

Don't want to miss the best from Business Standard?

The Bombay High court today allowed Reliance Infrastructure (RInfra) to amend the Rs 100 crore defamation suit filed by it against Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) which alleged that the company was overcharging consumers in collusion with Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission.

RInfra, a power distribution company, said it wanted to carry out amendments as it had collected some material which would strengthen its case against AAP.

In another development, senior counsel Aspi Chinoy appeared for three representatives of AAP, namely, Anjali Damania, Convenor, Maharashtra AAP, Preeti Sharma Menon, State Secretary, and Satish Jain, member, State AAP.

Also Read

The trio had allegedly addressed a press conference recently making allegations against RInfra. Justice S J Kathawala had earlier this week asked them to appear before him today as they had not come to the court on last occasion.

Arguing for RInfra, senior lawyers Venkatesh Dhond and Birendra Saraf urged the court to allow them to carry out amendments as they had got additional material which would prima facie justify their case for defamation.

The court asked them to submit a draft of amendments on March 10 and said it would then ask AAP to file a reply. The case was adjourned to two weeks.

RInfra has taken out a notice of motion praying that the defendants be restrained from repeating the allegations of the Anil Ambani-led firm being involved in a "power scam".

The plaintiffs alleged the AAP office-bearers had made baseless and false allegations at a press conference here last month to mislead the people, thereby defaming the company.

At the conference, AAP had accused RInfra and Tata Power of misrepresenting taxes and putting a burden of Rs 434 crore on consumers in Mumbai over the last three years.

"Misrepresentation of taxes has surfaced in which both RInfra and Tata Power are involved, causing a burden of Rs 434 crore on Mumbaikars in the past three years," Damania had said at the February 27 meet.

RInfra and Tata Power had strongly denied the charge the same day itself.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 07 2014 | 7:11 PM IST

Next Story