How was the infection/ virus identified? The first reported outbreak happened in Malaysia in 1998, so the sequence of virus was available even though the strain in Siliguri was different.
The biological samples were quickly collected from the cases and contacts and were sent to national and international laboratories for isolating and identifying the pathogenic organism. Thus the disease was identified as Nipah. Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC-Atlanta, USA) confirmed through sequencing, that the strain was of Nipah virus. The first cases of infection from Nipah virus had been reported from Malaysia in the year 1998-99 which led to the discovery of a novel paramyxovirus. This was named as Nipah virus. In Siliguri it was also found that the source of the virus were bats. The infection was quickly controlled by educating the public to avoid contact with infected patients.
Ringing and noise interventions were used to disperse and chase away bats. Health workers were advised to handle patients by taking precautions, like usng N95 masks, wearing protective gear, avoiding fomite and standard precautions, including washing hands, using cap and gloves. Thus using the protective measures the infection was rapidly controlled.
Further analysis of the sequences of virus isolated from India showed variations in sequence homology when compared to the viruses isolated in Malaysia and from other outbreaks reported from Australia, where Nipah, from its reservoir host spilled over into the domestic pigs and ultimately infected the humans.
Another outbreak had also occurred in India, in Nadia district of West Bengal and then in neighbouring Bangladesh, where too the source of viral infection, were bats. Here too the infection spread among people living in close proximity and the transmission was quickly controlled in the confined area with implementation of effective measures.
We collected samples and cultured them and found a viral strain that cannot infect further in the case of Siliguri. So we started looking in-depth and found that it was the fruit bats which were responsible. If a fruit half-eaten by a fruit bat was eaten by a human, the saliva that the bat left behind caused the disease in human.
A similar Nipah viral attack happened in Dhaka (2006), where again the culprit was a bat, although the sequence was different. It was contained quickly once the virus was identified.
What can be done to contain the fallout?