In a massive development set to rock the Censor Board and the film industry, the monitoring body is likely to be stripped off its 'censoring' powers and will be left only with the authority to 'certify'.
According to Information and Broadcasting (I&B) sources, the ministry is working on major changes in the Cinematography Act and the bill will be introduced in the winter session of Parliament.
In the wake of the recent furore by the film industry under Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) Chairperson Pahlaj Nihalani, the government has expressed its desire to avoid any further controversies.
Sources further stated the entire film certification process will be reworked and changed, adding there will be two committees: one for reviewing and the other for monitoring.
The members of the two committees will also be appointed from the National Commission for Women, National Commission for Protection of Child Rights including psychologists.
The films will be given certificates under following categories: U12+, U15+, A and A+ (for extreme violence and sex scenes).
The monitoring committee will not clear more than two movies in a day and there will also be a 'tatkal' category for those producers, who want urgent clearance, provided they are ready to pay extra for it.
Money collected for certification will go to the Labour ministry, which sends the money for welfare of the workers involved in film making.
Sources added that another amendment is regarding smoking warnings, where instead of present warning during each smoking scene, the films will have to show warning in the beginning of the movie.
The government says the basic idea behind the revamp is to let the people decide what they want to watch.
Nihalani recently came under attack following the harsh cuts on the controversial movie 'Udta Punjab', where actors and politicos joined took on the CBFC, complaining of unrealistic standards.
Asserting there is no mention of the word "censor" in the CBFC, the Bombay High Court had earlier in June pulled up the board for demanding 89 cuts in 'Udta Punjab' to grant a certificate for its release, while directing it to use its power as per the constitutional provisions and directions issued by the Supreme Court.
The High Court observed, "There is no mention of the word 'censor' in the board. The board should use its powers under the constitutional framework and the Supreme Court's directions.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)