Punishment under section 304A IPC absolutely inadequate: Supreme Court

Section 304A IPC prescribes two year jail term along with fine or both

Tripods of television crew stand in front of the Supreme Court building in New Delhi
Tripods of television crew stand in front of the Supreme Court building in New Delhi
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Aug 26 2016 | 6:59 PM IST
The Supreme Court on Friday termed as "absolutely inadequate" the maximum punishment for causing death by rash or negligent act, of up to two years jail term and a fine prescribed for the offence under the IPC.

The apex court sought the assistance of Attorney General (AG) Mukul Rohatgi to apprise it about the request made by it through its two judgements to Parliament for making the punishment harsher for the offence under section 304A (causing death by rash or negligent act) of the IPC.

A bench of Justices Dipak Misra and C Nagappan said the apex court had twice earlier urged Parliament to consider this issue to make the punishment "harsher" for the offence.

Section 304A IPC prescribes two year jail term along with fine or both.

Referring to the earlier judgements, the bench said it was "clearly indicated that punishment provided under section 304A of IPC is absolutely inadequate".

"We would like to hear the Attorney General on this issue," the bench said and asked Additional Solicitor General Maninder Singh to apprise the AG about it.

The bench, which posted the matter for hearing on August 30, also observed that the apex court had requested Parliament to amend section 304A IPC so that harsher punishment could be imposed on the offenders.

The court's observation came while it was hearing a petition on the issue regarding death by negligent act.

The bench told the petitioner that there was no merit in his plea but said it would hear AG on this issue.

"Your special leave petition has no merit. You be around when this matter comes up for hearing. Let the Attorney General come and say what is going on. Let him say whether section 304A IPC requires amendment or not," the bench said.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 26 2016 | 6:42 PM IST

Next Story