Rajasthan HC questions IPL matches in Jaipur

The Bombay High Court had earlier ordered that the BCCI shift venues for the IPL out of the state as it was facing drought

IPL
Mumbai Indian batsman Rohit Sharma plays a shot during IPL Match against KKR in Kolkata. Photo: PTI
Viveat Susan Pinto Mumbai
Last Updated : Apr 22 2016 | 1:54 AM IST
The fate of three matches of Mumbai Indians to be held in Jaipur next month has come under a cloud, following the Rajasthan High Court issuing notices to the state government and the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) on Thursday.

The notices seek an explanation from the government and the BCCI on the validity of holding Indian Premier League (IPL) matches in a water-starved state. The notices were issued in response to a public interest litigation (PIL) filed on Wednesday by a Jaipur-based journalist. Both parties have been given time till April 27 to explain their positions.

The Rajasthan High Court's directive has come within weeks of similar observations made by the Bombay High Court.

The Bombay High Court had ordered the BCCI and its cash-rich league to shift all matches out of drought-hit Maharashtra after April 30. While the BCCI and Maharashtra Cricket Association got a temporary relief for one match - to be held on May 1 in Pune between Mumbai Indians and Rising Pune Supergiants - 12 matches will have to be organised outside the state.

Last week, in a meeting between IPL Chairman Rajeev Shukla and the affected teams, the Pune franchise had opted for Visakhapatnam, while the Mumbai team preferred Jaipur. Pune would play four matches in Visakhapatnam's Dr Y S Rajasekhar Reddy ACA-VDCA stadium, while Mumbai Indians is scheduled to play its three matches at the Sawai Mansingh Stadium in Jaipur. Bengaluru will host the final and first qualifier, while Kolkata will host the eliminator and second qualifier.

Mumbai Indians officials were not available for a comment. Sources, however, said the BCCI is expected to highlight the logistical nightmare that venue-shifting entails. It had made a similar plea before the Bombay High Court. The BCCI might even consider shifting the IPL outside India from next year, to avoid regulatory and legal hurdles.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 22 2016 | 12:25 AM IST

Next Story