IPL scam: SC suggests panel to decide punishment for Meiyappan, others

Says it does not want to disqualify Srinivasan but the committee should decide if he can contest BCCI election

BS Reporter New Delhi
Last Updated : Dec 10 2014 | 12:24 AM IST
The Supreme Court on Tuesday suggested that a committee be formed to go into the aspect of punishment for those found guilty in the Indian Premier League (IPL) spot-fixing scam, especially Gurunath Meiyappan, son-in-law of suspended Board Of Control For Cricket In India (BCCI) president N Srinivasan and former official of Chennai Super Kings. He was found guilty in the spot-fixing scam that came to light last year.

The bench headed by T S Thakur clarified it did not want to bypass BCCI but mooted the idea of a panel which will also go into preventive steps so that situations like the present one involving conflict of interest does not occur in future. This will be in the best interest of the game, the judges observed. They added the rules could even be amended to save cricket.

BCCI counsel C A Sundaram said the panel can suggest the punishment that would be binding but other recommendations of the panel like amendments to the rules would require the approval of the general body. The committee can only make suggestions to change the rules; otherwise the bylaws would cease to have any effect.

Kapil Sibal, senior counsel for Srinivasan, submitted that the latter’s reputation will be affected by further probe. There are only allegations against Srinivasan which have not been affirmed by the Mudgal committee. He should be allowed to contest the coming election to the top post in the BCCI, the counsel said. Senior counsel Nalini Chidambaram, representing the Cricket Association of Bihar which opposes Srinivasan, however, said the investigation had not given a clean chit to Srinivasan and she had given documentary proof before the court to show cover-up and conflict of interest. Srinivasan should be kept out of the contest, she insisted.

She wanted to present documentary evidence before the committee if it was formed. According to her, Srinivasan must suffer the same punishment as Meiyappan.

Sibal vehemently opposed the suggestion and asserted that there should be no “person-specific” action, and Srinivasan should be allowed to contest the BCCI election. The judges said they did not want to disqualify Srinivasan, but the air should be cleared by a committee, if possible.

The arguments on the IPL scam has spilled over to the second week and the hearing will continue on Wednesday.

ALSO READ: I should not have attended TN cricket body meets: Srinivasan to SC
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 10 2014 | 12:23 AM IST

Next Story