SC rejects govt's plea on Aadhaar

To hear all parties on October 22

BS Reporter New Delhi
Last Updated : Oct 09 2013 | 1:13 AM IST
The Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected the government’s plea for an interim stay on its earlier order declaring no one in the country should suffer while availing government services because of lack of an Aadhaar or unique identity (UID) number. This means continuation of the uncertainty over the Direct Benefits Transfer project, under which welfare payments are sent directly to the beneficiaries’ Aadhaar-linked bank accounts.

However, the court agreed to hear all parties supporting and opposing the order finally on October 22.

Apart from a few central ministries and three public sector undertakings that requested a modification of the order, there are several other parties, such as activist Aruna Roy, who have moved a petition against the Aadhaar linkage in the court.

Attorney General G E Vahanvati, representing the petroleum ministry, argued that the earlier order of September 23 would have “serious consequences” if it remained in operation. The counsel said the government is subsidising Rs 40,000 crore only on gas cylinders and subsidised supply of gas without Aadhaar should not happen.

According to Vahanvati, while ration cards and election cards can be duplicated, Aadhaar can’t be forged. The counsel insisted no one is compelled to get the UID number and the scheme is voluntary. It is a condition only to get subsidised benefits. Anyone is free to buy gas cylinders from the open market beyond the nine-cylinder limit for Aadhaar holders.

The Attorney General insisted the government can invoke executive power to implement the scheme. According to him, this issue had been decided two years ago.

The judges remarked that all the issues before the court would be solved if an Act was passed. At present, the scheme was being implemented without a law, rule, regulation or circular. They said their basic concern was to provide essential items to the people. Aadhaar is required to even get a salary in the Bombay High Court, one judge remarked.

The issue blew up after a retired judge of the Karnataka high court, K S Puttaswamy, moved the Supreme Court, alleging the scheme was being enforced all over the country without any Parliamentary sanction. He also raised the issue of privacy, as the Aadhaar number provides personal details of all citizens to the government.

After the Supreme Court passed an interim order on September 23, the issue had created confusion in several states and petitions had been filed in different high courts, apart from half a dozen in the Supreme Court itself.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 09 2013 | 12:35 AM IST

Next Story