Simultaneous polls would benefit national parties: Experts
BJP has been of the view that there should be combined elections from panchayat to Parliament
Press Trust of India New Delhi Simultaneous Lok Sabha and state assembly elections would benefit national parties but dwarf the role of smaller regional ones which is not a good sign for a healthy democracy, according to experts.
"Whether one acknowledges it or not, the wave factor associated with big political leaders and parties does affect the outcome in state polls. And, therefore simultaneous elections would benefit national parties, and small regional parties' fate will be difficult.
"As a diverse country with a federal structure, the idea of holding simultaneous polls somewhat does not bode well. The presence of small parties is a manifestation of the democracy that we are, which allows voters the option to choose from," former Chief Election Commissioner SY Quraishi said.
He was speaking at a panel discussion on 'Simultaneous Elections – Possibilities and Challenges' organised by the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) in the national capital.
Director at the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS) Sanjay Kumar also said, "Elections held simultaneously are likely to benefit more the big national parties, and the role of small regional parties will be suppressed."
BJP has been of the view that there should be combined elections from panchayat to Parliament, with Prime Minister Narendra Modi was also keen on simultaneous Lok Sabha and Assembly polls.
President Pranab Mukherjee has also articulated that such a system could ensure political and administrative stability, as frequent elections disrupt regular functioning of the government, and that political parties could collectively take a decision on the issue.
The panelists at the event were largely of the view that "staggered" format of electoral exercise was in favour of the federal structure, and if at all the proposition of simultaneous elections is to be considered, an "all-party consensus" should be reached first.
The BJP has held that state elections coupled with local-level polls, spread across virtually every year, often "hinder" the execution of welfare measures, and Union Minister M Venkaiah Naidu has said that India can pursue 'one nation, one election' model.
Quraishi said having simultaneous election would also increase the logistical burden, starting with the massive number of EVM machines needed, and will cost the exchequer.
Another panelist, BJP Rajya Sabha member Bhupender Yadav said that instead of 'one-nation one-election', the model should be "one-nation and systematic scheduled polls" to bring an order in the process.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York TimesSubscribeRenews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Complimentary Access to The New York Times

News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Curated Newsletters

Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
Seamless Access Across All Devices