Vigilance orders probe in appointment row in Kerala

The complaint sought for an FIR to be lodged against Kerala's Industries Minister, E P Jayarajan

The deserted roads in Thiruvananthapuram on Thursday due to strike by BJP workers in protest against the brutal killing of a party activist in Kannur.PTI:Photo
The deserted roads in Thiruvananthapuram on Thursday due to strike by BJP workers in protest against the brutal killing of a party activist in Kannur.<b>PTI:Photo<b/>
Press Trust of India Thiruvananthapuram
Last Updated : Oct 14 2016 | 4:02 PM IST
The Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (VACB) has ordered a preliminary probe to look into certain controversial appointments made in the state's public sector undertakings.

A probe has been initiated against Kerala's Industries Minister, E P Jayarajan, for appointing relatives in key posts.

The bureau informed this to a special court that was hearing a private petition seeking to register a First Information Report (FIR) and ordering of a probe into the alleged appointments.

However, VACB Additional Prosecutor raised the contention that the petition was purely based on newspaper clippings and that they were only secondary evidence to the allegations.

The next hearing of the case is scheduled to take place on October 17.

The complaint had also sought  the filing of an FIR and against Jayarajan, who had allegedly appointed P K Sudheer, his nephew and son of CPI(M) Kannur MP P K Sreemathi, as the Managing Director of Kerala State Industrial Enterprises Ltd.

It was also alleged that some relatives of other party leaders were also given key posts in PSUs.

The Special Court (Vigilance) had directed the bureau to file its reply on the alleged appointments by October 14.

With opposition Congress and BJP targeting the ruling Left Democratic Party (LDF) on the issue, the state government had on October 13 decided to bring in a law to prevent nepotism in appointments in key positions in PSUs in the state.

The cabinet had also entrusted Chief Secretary S M Vijayan with the task of examining various complaints with regard to all appointments.

The complaint filed in the Vigilance court contended that nepotism amounted to corruption. It also wanted registration of a case under Prevention of Corruption Act.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 14 2016 | 2:13 PM IST

Next Story