ASG advises Centre to clarify law over cotton seed prices

Existing deadlock renders future investments in the sector uncertain, say industry players

Bt Cotton
Round-up ready Bt cotton was introduced in bollgard-2 packages, the organisations alleged
Dilip Kumar Jha Mumbai
Last Updated : Jul 13 2017 | 1:36 AM IST
Differing interpretations by the government and the industry on the interoperability of the Indian Patent Act and the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act have caused uncertainty over future technology investments that could cause damage to cotton farmers across the country.
 
A letter dated June 16 to the agriculture secretary, Additional Solicitor-General (ASG) Tushar Mehta said, “It is my considered opinion that the central government must file written submissions confining to the questions of law and without touching upon the internal disputes between the two private companies.”
 
Mehta was responding to a letter written by the agriculture secretary on May 31 seeking a legal view on the various court cases filed by Monsanto and Nuziveedu Seeds over use of the former’s patented technology despite the termination of sub-licence agreements.
 
Following representations by cotton farmers claiming Monsanto charged different seed prices across states, the government issued the Cotton Seeds Price (Control) Order, 2015, under the Essential Commodities Act to fix seed prices based on the “trait value” along with a patent fee for the developer.
 
“Any decision on the point of law in the appeal would have a direct impact not only on the interpretation of the existing Indian Patent law as well as PPV&FR Act but also on all pending writ petitions that are being defended by the central government and other central agencies” Mehta’s letter added.
 
“Having failed to get any interim relief before the Delhi High Court by the subsidiary company of Monsanto, an association sponsored by Monsanto moved to the high court of Karnataka at Bangalore. An ex parte stay was initially granted by a single judge bench, which was vacated later. The central government is contesting the said proceedings vigorously as a result of which even the appeal filed by the said association came to be dismissed,” the letter said.
 
Earlier, the agriculture ministry had filed a reference before the Competition Commission of India against Monsanto and its subsidiaries for anti-competitive business practices.
 
The CCI found a prima facie case of violation of various sections of the Competition Act and directed an investigation against Monsanto and its subsidiary companies.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Next Story