Bombay HC issues notices to Centre, Maharashtra over blocking of ITC

The petitioner, which is engaged in renting and leasing movable and immovable properties, challenged section 17(5)(c) of Central GST Act and the same section in the Maharashtra GST Act

Bombay High Court
Bombay High Court
Indivjal Dhasmana New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Jan 25 2022 | 2:08 AM IST
The Bombay High Court has issued notices to the Centre and the Maharashtra government over a petition that seeks to declare as unconstitutional, a provision in the GST laws which empowers the authorities to block input tax credit (ITC) on works contract services in the real estate.

The petitioner, which is engaged in the business of renting and leasing out movable and immovable properties, challenged the section 17(5)(c) of the Central GST (CGST) Act and the same section in the Maharashtra GST Act. The section prohibits input tax credit to the works contract service for construction of an immovable property other than the plant and machinery except where it is an input service for further supply of works contract.

Works contract is essentially a contract of service which may also involve supply of goods in the execution of the contract.

The petitioner entered into a master rental agreement with a company to provide it furnished premises on lease. The petitioner procured works contract services to make the premises.

By virtue of the section cited above, ITC on works contract services used by the petitioner stands denied.

Äbhishek Rastogi, a counsel for the petitioner and partner Khaitan & Co., argued that the section fails to recognise that these services are used by the petitioner in furtherance of its business.

The petitioner argued that since the leasing services provided by it are taxable, blockage of ITC resulted in breaking of the credit chain which goes against the ethos of the GST principles. GST was envisaged to do away with the cascading effect of taxes, it said.

"The objective of the GST system is to remove the cascading effect of tax on tax and ensure the flow of credits. As a corollary, any blocked credit will have to pass several tests of reasonability, public interest and above all constitutionality," Rastogi said.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :input tax creditBombay High CourtGSTMaharashtra government

Next Story