In case of miners who carried out illegal mining in forest areas, penalties amounting to 70 per cent of the benchmark price should be recovered from the offending miners, the panel said in its recommendation to the top court submitted today.
CEC has also directed the state government to re-investigate allegations of violation of Rule-37 (of Mineral Concession Rules, 1960) by the mine owners and take appropriate action. “The CEC is of the view that it may be appropriate that 30 per cent of the notional value of iron ore and manganese ore produced by each of the lessees without environmental clearances may be directed to be recovered from the concerned lessees. If the concerned party fails to pay the amount within the prescribed time period (three months), then operations of their mines will be suspended and thereafter should be determined”, it said in its recommendation regarding status of illegal mining in Odisha. The CEC recommendation is much lesser than Rs 61,705.70 crore penalty demanded by the Odisha government from offending miners in cases of excess mining as it has taken only benchmark price issued by the Indian Bureau of Mines (IBM), citing that taking year wise price of different grades of iron ore and manganese is a ‘cumbersome process’.
The CEC has found that a total of 213 million tonne iron ore and 2.4 million tonne manganese ore were extracted between 2001 and 2010 in Odisha by 72 leaseholders. Out of these, 14 leaseholders, including state run Odisha Mining Corporation (OMC), BPME Ltd, a PSU of Union government, Tata Steel and Aditya Birla Group controlled Essel Mining were responsible for more than 70 per cent of illegally extracted ore output.
For miners who have encroached forest areas beyond lease permit, the CEC has recommended that an amount of Rs 5 crore per hectare (ha) should be collected for dumping wastes of mining activities and Rs 1 crore for carrying out allied activities of mining. Though the CEC lauded the state government’s recent action to curb illegal mining, it commented that the state government and its officials ‘cannot escape the responsibility for such brazen violations of Acts and Rules’.
While examining violation regarding transfer of mining lease ownership, the committee said that the miners and ore extracting contractors took the benefit of lax attitude of the state government officials.
It observed that the payment mode for ore raising contract was either in terms of percentage of total earning made from ore sales or were substantially higher raising cost than ore raised by state-run agencies such as OMC.
“Such practices, if not checked, will have serious consequences,” it said in its observation. The report was submitted in accordance with the Supreme Court order in May this year.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)