Don't hide note ban info, PAC tells govt

Economic Affairs Secretary tells house panel govt had no record of money deposited since cash-ban

Demonetisation, currency, notes
.
Amit Agnihotri New Delhi
Last Updated : Feb 11 2017 | 1:21 AM IST
The Public Accounts Committee of Parliament was miffed at Economic Affairs Secretary Shaktikanta Das’s reply to it that the government had no record of money deposited in banks since November 8, when demonetisation was announced. The panel has asked him to furnish a written statement.

Das said the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) was counting the money deposited in banks and the exercise would take some more time, sources said. PAC Chairman K V Thomas asked the senior finance ministry official why the government was hiding the data and told him that this argument would not work.

Thomas also told Das to be more transparent in the matter as secrecy would lead to suspicion in the minds of people.
In the previous PAC meeting, on January 20, RBI Governor Urjit Patel had given a similar reply, saying information on money deposited in banks since the note ban was not available. He, too, was asked to furnish a written statement by the panel.
When some members wanted to know who took the note ban decision, Das told the panel the government had taken the decision on the recommendation of the RBI. He also said the government had started discussions on note ban since January 2016.

Why did the government not follow an ordinance route to demonetisation, as was done in 1978, but resorted to an executive order? The economic affairs secretary replied it was done to maintain secrecy.

Besides Das, Revenue Secretary Hasmukh Adhia also briefed the panel. Congress member Satyavrat Chaturvedi wanted to know how much black money and fake currency has been recovered.

On queries related to problems being faced by people as all automatic teller machines (ATMs) were not dispensing cash, Financial Services Secretary Anjuly Chhib Duggal told the panel the cash supply situation would normalise by the end of March.

When some panel members pointed out that non-performing assets of public sector banks had gone up, the financial services secretary replied that this was due to bad debts getting properly defined and now showing in the books.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Next Story