Steel Minister Beni Prasad Verma has been in news for his statement “inflation helps farmers”. He tells Kavita Chowdhury on why he stands by his statement and how FDI in retail would set right prices for both agriculturalists and consumers. Edited Excerpts:
You have said ‘inflation helps farmers’, but in reality, inflation also leads to rise in prices of agricultural inputs like fertiliser, diesel and so on, affecting their cost of living.
Since Independence, all classes and groups have progressed; farmers, in comparison, have not progressed as much as other groups. The population has quadrupled, and, hence, the land area is getting smaller for the individual farmer. Those who are into growing routine crops, the returns are far less than from cash crops. Therefore, small farmers can’t invest much in their land for better yield. In fact, farmers are getting poorer by the day.
At the time of Independence, government servants whose monthly income was Rs 100 a month today gets between Rs 70,000 and Rs 80,000. The income disparity between the government servants and farmers is rising. In modern India today, 75 per cent of farmers still don’t have toilets, they can’t afford to give their children good education or send them to engineering and medical colleges.
The UPA-I government had given a farm loan waiver of Rs 72,000 crore to provide relief to farmers. Then, MNREGS gave relief to landless labourers. But these measures were not enough to uplift them.
The only solution is FDI in retail. Why are political parties, including the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), opposed to it? Don’t they want farmers to be uplifted? FDI will benefit farmers, only the middleman would be eliminated, and small shopkeepers would not be affected.
Your recent statements have caused a furore and the Congress party is being accused of moving away from the ‘aam aadmi’.
No, it is not so. The Congress is still connected with the ‘aam aadmi’, of which farmers are the biggest segment. If FDI in retail comes in, agricultural prices and consumer prices get balanced. The middleman would be done away with and both farmers and consumers would be benfitted.
You have also been quoted as saying, ‘If people’s salaries can go up, why not prices of farm produce.’ Do you still stand by your statements?
I stand by my statements. I see nothing contradictory in them. Price rise of agricultural produce helps farmers. What I meant by ‘inflation’ was in fact ‘price rise in agricultural produce’.
Your recent comment ticking off Mulayam Singh Yadav for suggesting a third front with him at the helm after 2014 election has soured the friendly relations between the Samajwadi Party and the Congress.
I can tolerate the Samajwadi Party’s friendship with the Congress party, but I cannot tolerate the prospect of Mulayam Singh Yadav as the prime minister. I will choose not to join that government. In any case, that is an impossible scenario.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
