Once bitten, twice shy. Fearing repeat of a recent fiasco triggered by its move to permit FDI in retail, the union cabinet on Tuesday deferred a decision on what can be called the present government’s most ambitious social welfare scheme: the Food Security Bill. For, differences continue to persist within UPA-II over the content and subsidy implications of the proposed legislation.
On his part, Pawar raised the issue of a steep cost involved in fulfilling the legal entitlements promised in the Bill. According to him, the subsidy costs run into Rs 95,000 crore.
The minister questioned the efficacy of the present delivery system, and said the states too had not done enough to roll out the scheme that promises subsidised foodgrains to almost two-third of the country’s population.
Sources say home minister P Chidambaram (of the Congress) also spoke of the same handicap. Health minister Ghulam Nabi Azad and Urban Development minister Kamal Nath, too, sought greater clarity on the finer aspects of the Bill.
The UPA’s biggest ally, Trinamool Congress, also seemed not convinced with many provisions of the Bill. Enacting the Bill is expected to swell the food subsidy to over Rs one lakh-crore from the current Rs 60,000 crore.
The proposed legislation seeks to provide legal entitlement for grains to three-fourth of the rural population and half of urban population. The Bill was earlier scheduled to be discussed tomorrow. It was advanced by a day on the insistence of food minister K V Thomas, who wanted to present it in the ongoing winter session of Parliament.
On July 12, the draft food security Bill was cleared by an empowered group of ministers. After that, too, it underwent some key changes — such as the inclusion of a provision to distribute an allowance of Rs 1,000 per month to all pregnant and lactating women, in addition to cheap grains (this, at the initiative of Gandhi).
Last week, the government put off its decision to go for up to 51 per cent foreign direct investment in multi-brand retail, after some of the UPA allies as well as the opposition parties animatedly rallied against the move.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
