Government lifts condition restricting export incentive under GST

Earlier, the DGFT and the customs department had imposed a condition that the advance authorisation scheme would be available to exporters only if imports have been undertaken by them

export
Indivjal Dhasmana New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 11 2019 | 10:37 PM IST
The government has issued a notification to withdraw a condition that restricts claiming of an export incentive under goods and services tax (GST), after various petitions were filed in courts against the curbs.

However, the petitioners say that they will not take back the petitions since the removal happened only prospectively. 

Earlier, the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) and the customs department had imposed a condition that the advance authorisation scheme would be available to exporters only if imports have been undertaken by them. 

This is termed pre-import condition, which was effective from October 13, 2017.

An advance authorisation licence is issued to allow duty-free import of inputs, which are used in exports. There was no such condition imposed on the scheme in the pre-GST period. 

Change in the condition meant that imports done after exports cannot avail exemptions from IGST and compensation cess.

This led exporters and importers to move courts, including Delhi High Court, Gujarat High Court and Punjab and Haryana High Court as the directorate of revenue intelligence (DRI) started issuing notices to them. 

Advance authorisation is generally used for importing goods after exports are undertaken, as against the pre-import condition imposed, said Abhishek Rastogi, counsel for the petitioners. As such, the condition defeats the purpose of the scheme, he added. 
After much hue and cry, the customs department and DGFT on Thursday issued a notification, withdrawing the condition. 

However, the condition has been withdrawn from January 10 only. Though the scheme is available till March 31, 2019, sources said it may be extended further like in the past. The petitioners contested this and refused to withdraw their pleas in courts. 

“This would not provide relief to imports made between October 13, 2017 and January 9, 2019, thereby the petitions filed will continue to seek relief in respect of such exports,” Rastogi said.
Rather, removal of the condition would boost arguments of the petitioners to refund the tax paid after DRI issued notices, he added.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Next Story