Alternatively, it has suggested if substantial improvements in the Labour Bureau’s quarterly enterprises surveys (QES) are made, a first-of-its-kind Employment Index can be formed on the lines of the Index of Industrial Production (IIP) and the Consumer Price Index (CPI).
The idea of an Employment Index was first mooted by Chief Statistician of India Pravin Srivastava to the government in June 2017, when he was the additional director general (employment) in the labour ministry.
The Anant-led technical committee, which submitted its report to Labour and Employment Minister Santosh Kumar Gangwar this week, has said the Labour Bureau’s surveys were incomplete and “should be discontinued henceforth”, according to documents reviewed by Business Standard.
The committee was set up by the government last year, on the recommendations of the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO), after it started releasing monthly payroll data of Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO), Employees’ State Insurance Corporation (ESIC), among others to give job estimates.
The committee, which had Srivastava, former chief economic adviser Arvind Subramanian, among others as members, was tasked to suggest whether the quarterly enterprises survey (QES) produced by the Labour Bureau is “relevant in the present circumstances especially after monthly payroll data” and suggest reforms in QES, “if it is to be made relevant.”
The panel said its assessment “raises a number of questions about the quality of data collected under the Labour Bureau’s QES.” The panel examined the records of employees surveyed by QES and mapped it with the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation subscribers and found “unexplained variations” between the two.
What the committee report said
- Discontinue Labour Bureau’s quarterly employment survey in its present form due to coverage and quality issues
- Substantially improve the Labour Bureau’s surveys based on which an Employment Index can be formed
- EPFO data can be used rigorously if categorised statistically using appropriate methods and coding structure
- There is unexplained variations between the QES reports and EPFO’s payroll data
It noted that the difference could be on account of differences in approaches to data collection, conceptual differences, coverage, completeness and representativeness.
“It is clear that the QES dataset is incomplete and due to coverage and quality issues should not be continued in its present form to generate estimates at the national level. The QES should be discontinued henceforth,” the panel’s report stated.
On the EPFO’s database, the committee was of the view that there is a “wealth of information that can be used more rigorously” if it is categorised statistically using appropriate methods and coding structures of the National Industrial Classification (NIC).
The panel said if substantial improvement is made in collecting, sampling and framing the Labour Bureau’s QES, an Employment Index can be formed. The panel went a step further by framing a sample index on the basis of the QES reports, in its report submitted to the labour minister.
According to the sample employment index framed by the committee, the growth in employment index stood at 1.65 per cent in October-December 2017, compared to 1.76 per cent in the previous quarter. The employment index grew 1.5 per cent in April-June 2017, as per the panel’s report.
A task force to improve employment data in the country, headed by former NITI Aayog Vice-Chairman Arvind Panagariya, had also pointed out serious flaws in the Labour Bureau’s quarterly surveys but had not recommended doing away with it in its report sent to the government in August 2017.
The quarterly survey of the Labour Bureau was revamped and released in September 2016 to increase its coverage five-fold to 10,000 units.
The Labour Bureau has also discontinued its annual household surveys on employment from 2017-18 as it is being replaced by the National Sample Survey Office’s period labour force survey to be released shortly. The findings of the survey for 2016-17 are yet to be made public although the report has been approved by Gangwar last month. According to the Labour Bureau’s annual survey, the unemployment rate rose to a four-year high of 3.9 per cent in 2016-17.
In his interviews to various media outlets last year, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had said how lack of jobs data was more serious issue than dearth of jobs itself.
One subscription. Two world-class reads.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)