According to the proposal of the draft laws, in the northeastern states the threshold is even lower at Rs 5 lakh. The draft laws also propose collection of taxes at source for e-commerce companies, including aggregators, and simplify the definition of “services” to include intangibles such as software and work contracts.
These were released on the Union finance ministry website for public feedback, hours after a meeting of the Empowered Committee of Finance Ministers on GST. All states except Tamil Nadu were on board, Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley told reporters.
According to the draft laws, GST shall apply to all intra-state supply of goods and services. While the supplier of goods will have to bear the tax burden in most cases, the recipient might also have to bear it in some.
Experts said releasing the draft GST laws was a positive step, as these clearly define the contours of the tax regime.
“The government releasing the draft GST laws in public domain is a positive step. It shows the intent of the Centre to implement it by April 1, 2017,” said Rakesh Nangia, a senior partner at tax consultants Nangia and Co.
Including individuals and entities with turnover of Rs 10 lakh — Rs 5 lakh in the Northeast — in the GST purview has raised eyebrows.
“The current threshold for excise is Rs 1.5 crore. Hence, many more businesses would come under the central tax net. Industry was hoping for a higher threshold of at least Rs 25 lakh,” said Pratik Jain, a tax consultant with PwC India. The laws also state that e-commerce companies shall, out of the money owed to suppliers of goods, keep aside specified amounts in lieu of GST deducted at source, at rates recommended by the taxman.
“This will mean significant compliance burden on e-commerce companies, as many of them deal with thousands of vendors. Further, this may lead to refund situation for many suppliers who operate on thin margins,” Jain said.
But the clarity of the draft laws has been appreciated.
| WHAT NEXT? With the empowered GST committee of state finance ministers making headway in Kolkata, the road ahead becomes clearer: |
|
“We raised the issue of dual control. There was a consensus that for turnover above Rs 1.5 crore, states will have control on GST. Above Rs 1.5 crore turnover, there will be dual control. This will be beneficial for small business,” he said, adding the matter would again be discussed at the next meeting in July.
The two-day meeting in Kolkata is being attended by finance ministers of 22 states as well as chief ministers of Arunachal Pradesh and Meghalaya and the deputy CM of Delhi, and senior officials.
At the end of the first day, Jaitley said: “Virtually all the states have supported the idea of GST today barring Tamil Nadu which has expressed some reservations. It has offered a few a suggestions which have been noted by the committee.”
“The fact that the draft law was released shows that the states were on board for almost all the issues,” said Menon of KPMG.
The draft laws were shared with the state finance ministers as well.
FM Jaitley said there was consensus among states that there would be no constitutional cap on GST rates.
Congress has been demanding that there should be a cap on the GST rate and it should be included in the Constitution Amendment Bill. The Bill has been stuck in the Rajya Sabha for some time.
Two other issues widely discussed in the meeting were the calculation of the revenue neutral rate and the management of taxation structure in the perspective of the dual control of the Centre and state.
Chief Economic Advisor Arvind Subramanian will also make a presentation on the revenue neutral rate calculation in July.
“While the principal advisor to the FM has suggested 17 per cent revenue neutral rate (RNR), another research institute has suggested 26.5 per cent. Given the divergence in views, the empowered committee of the finance ministers will meet again in July to discuss the two issues, the dual management and the RNR,” said Mitra.
In the meantime, the government will also form a committee and present a report on the acceptable RNR, he added.
Presentations would be made by the principal advisor to the finance minister and the National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
Jaitley said for five years, if there is any loss of revenue to the state, it would be the liability of the Centre to compensate for it. He added the Centre is flexible on the issue of additional one per cent tax for two years as a compensation to the manufacturing states.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)