Gujarat is now the country’s ninth fastest growing among states and Union Territories (UT), behind Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Delhi, Uttarakhand, Tripura, Goa, Kerala and Odisha. The state’s rank improves to seventh if average growth for the past five years is taken into account. The analysis excludes smaller states and UTs such as Sikkim, Mizoram, Puducherry, Manipur and Andaman & Nicobar Islands.
Experts attribute Gujarat’s relative underperformance to its larger base, among other factors. In FY13, Gujarat had the fifth largest economy (Rs 4.27 lakh crore) among all states, behind Maharashtra (Rs 8.44 lakh crore), Tamil Nadu (Rs 4.51 lakh crore), Uttar Pradesh (Rs 4.45 lakh crore) and Andhra Pradesh (Rs 4.42 lakh crore). In per capita terms, Gujarat is the eighth richest behind Goa, Delhi, Chandigarh, Puducherry, Sikkim, Maharashtra and Haryana, according to data from the Central Statistics Office (CSO).
“The industrial slowdown in India has affected Gujarat’s performance. But it still grew faster than the all-India average. The smaller states (in terms of the size of the economy) are better off due to their low base, but would need to put in a lot of effort through affirmative policy action and expenditure by the government to scale up the process once a critical size is reached. That will be the challenge going ahead,” says D R Dogra, managing director of CARE Ratings. The industrial slowdown has impacted economic growth in industrialised states, including Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu, he says.
Andhra Pradesh topped the chart with 21.1 per cent CAGR growth in rural MPCE, followed by Haryana (20.4 per cent), Tamil Nadu (19.4 per cent) and Rajasthan (18.8 per cent). Gujarat’s urban MPCE growth at 15.1 per cent also lags the all-India urban MPCE growth of 15.6 per cent during the period, according to survey data from the National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO).
The report was rejected by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) The two other states whose development models the BJP is trying to cash in on — Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh — were also kept in the bracket of least developed states. Keeping company were Bihar, Odisha, Jharkhand, Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Meghalaya, UP and Rajasthan.
The new index, proposed by the Rajan committee, is based on averages of 10 sub-components — monthly per-capita consumption expenditure, education, health, household amenities, poverty rate, female literacy, share of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the total population, urbanisation rate, financial inclusion, and connectivity.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)