Delhi HC rules out pay parity between regular &contractual workers

The court's observation came while deciding two appeals filed by the management of Dr Baba Sahib Ambedkar Hospital, run by Delhi government, and by an employee of the hospital

<a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/gallery-891772p1.html?cr=00&pl=edit-00">claffra</a> / <a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/?cr=00&pl=edit-00">Shutterstock.com</a>
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : May 26 2013 | 10:33 AM IST
The dogma of 'same work same pay' cannot be applied in the case of difference in salaries of contractual and regular workers as the later category goes through the rigours of selection processes, the Delhi High Court has ruled.

"There cannot be complete parity between contractual employees and those who undergo selection process and are appointed as regular employees. On the principle of 'same work same pay', if there is complete identity of work between contractual employees and regular employees a court can direct same basic salary and allowances to be paid.

"But with reference to one set of persons not having undertaken the selection process and the second set having undertaken the selection process, the court could deny the benefit of increments," a bench of justices Pradeep Nandrajog and V Kameswar Rao said.

The court's observation came while deciding two appeals filed by the management of Dr Baba Sahib Ambedkar Hospital, run by Delhi government, and by an employee of the hospital respectively against two conflicting verdicts of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT).

The hospital had moved the court against a CAT verdict asking it to pay contractual para-medical staffs the salary, perks and perquisites, being paid to the regular ones.

The other appeal was filed by a contractual employee whose plea for equal salary was rejected by the CAT.

Disposing of the appeals by a common judgement, the bench said, "We have before us two conflicting views taken by the two different benches of the Tribunal.

"... Contract paramedical employees would be entitled to same pay and benefit as regular employees but in the minimum of the pay scale without grant of any increment unless they could show to the Tribunal that similarly situated contractual employee was being granted benefit of increments.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 26 2013 | 10:26 AM IST

Next Story