"For this, income declaration forms will have a separate column for details of foreign assets, accounts and the beneficial owner or nominee," said a senior official.
For the past two years, income tax returns required declaration of foreign income alone.
Also Read
| WIDENING NET |
|
The Bill defines undisclosed assets as those held by taxpayers and beneficial owners. "Based on a reading of the Bill, it appears these provisions will have far-reaching implications," said Tapati Ghosh, partner, Deloitte Haskins & Sells.
A release by the Press Information Bureau (PIB) somewhat complicated the matter. It not only mentioned beneficial owners, but also beneficiaries, which experts say might further widen the net to cover indirect beneficiaries. "The provisions would also apply to beneficial owners, beneficiaries of illegal foreign assets," Ghosh said, citing the PIB release.
The black money Bill, however, mentions only beneficial owners, not beneficiaries.
The Bill entails stringent penalties and prosecution in case of non-disclosure, including a penalty of 90 per cent of the undisclosed income or value of the asset and imprisonment of up to 10 years. The Bill would be taken up by Parliament in the second half of the Budget session, starting April 20.
The Bill provides a short window to taxpayers to disclose foreign assets and accounts to avoid prosecution. However, they have to give 60 per cent of the value of those assets (30 per cent tax, 30 per cent penalty). This one-time window isn't extended to accounts and entities against which the government and the income tax department have already launched prosecution or probes.
This means about 1,000 people on an HSBC list (of Indians allegedly having unaccounted money in HSBC's Geneva branch) might not be able to avail of this window.
"Once a person voluntarily discloses any undisclosed foreign asset under the one-time window provided in the Bill, in my view, his family members who are beneficial owners of that foreign asset cannot be subsequently and separately investigated upon and prosecuted. This is because in the voluntary disclosure, their relationship with the foreign asset would have been disclosed and tax paid thereon," said Sanjay Sanghvi, partner, Khaitan & Co.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)