ISPs too want revision

Image
Joji Thomas Philip New Delhi
Last Updated : Feb 06 2013 | 8:52 AM IST
Internet service providers have opposed Trai's proposal to impose access deficit charges (ADC) on their services.
 
The ISPs have said they are beyond the ambit of the inter-connect user charge (IUC) regime as they are not interconnecting parties. ADC and other related tariffs come under the IUC regime.
 
To their defence, ISPs have quoted an earlier communication issued by Trai: "When the IUC regime was first notified in January 2003, the authority had conveyed to us vide its letter dated October 15, 2003 that ISPs are not interconnecting parties and hence, are beyond the ambit of the IUC regime."
 
"It is really surprising to note that without even referring to this crucial fact, there is a specific question in the instant consultation paper, purporting ADC recovery as part of IUC regime from the ISPs," Internet Service Providers' Association of India (ISPAI) said in a letter to Trai.
 
"The very language of this question indicates an inherent bias that proposes a negative incentive on value-added service providers like ISPs for growing the market," the letter added.
 
According to ISPAI President Amitabh Sibghal, the regulator's proposal amounted to double taxation.
 
"ISPs do not have stand-alone networks -- they use the infrastructure of telecom operators who pay these levies. Internet tariffs will definitely increase if Trai were to recommend ADC recovery from us," he said. ISPs have also said that Trai's proposal contradicted its earlier recommendations on the issue.
 
Section 5.2 of the recommendations titled "Recommendation on specific issues referred to by DoT" states that "no levy should be charged from pure value-added services such as ISPs, Email and voice mail service providers which do not own facilities and thus are not in the category of network operators and carriers," they said.
 
With regard to the regulator studying the situation in other countries, ISPs have highlighted that in every country, "ISPs have been kept outside the purview of both universal service levy as well as the ADC, which are similar in concept and have identical objectives".
 
"ADC, which is part of the IUC, is to be paid only by facility-based telephony service providers and the value-added service providers are to be kept outside of such a regime," the ISPs added.

 
 

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 05 2005 | 12:00 AM IST

Next Story