JSW Power torn between conflicting verdicts

Image
Sanjay Jog Mumbai
Last Updated : Jan 21 2013 | 2:33 AM IST

Asks JSW to continue power supply to TN.

The Madras High Court today upheld open access (OA) in transmission and restrained JSW Power Trading Company and Southern Regional Load Despatch Centre (SRLDC) from either cancelling or curtailing the power supply schedule under OA to Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (TNEB).

Informed sources told Business Standard that TNEB had sought an interim relief in its petition after JSW Trading Company informed that it would not be in a position to supply power following the Karnataka government’s directive asking all the generators to supply exportable electricity to the state grid until further orders invoking section 11 of the Electricity Act 2003.

The Karnataka government had issued its directives after the Karnataka high court recently upheld the state government's powers to invoke section 11 of the Electricity Act.

TNEB had argued if power was not supplied it would be a breach of section 28 of the Electricity Act and is likely to cause grid collapse. In view of the high court's order, TNEB would continue to get power upto May.

The high court observed that “it clearly established the fact that JSW Trading, which had entered into a power purchase agreement for the supply of round-the-clock 300 MW power to TNEB for the period January to May, is itending to breach the provision under section 28 of the Electricity Act, 2003”.

“It will be contrary to the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC) (Open Access Inter State Transmission Regulations, 2004. The Southern Region Load Despatch Centre (SRLDC) has to take into consideration the interest of the entire region and maintain optimum scheduling and smooth flow of power inter state,” the HC order said.

The Madras high court directive is crucial at a time when the Karnataka high court had upheld the Karnataka government's authority to invoke section 11 of the Electricity Act 2003.

The Karnataka high court had ruled that open access does not mean unbridled rights or absolute right to supply electricity by generating of their choice. It is done to promote competition among generating companies to ensure cheaper power supply to consumers. Such liberalisation has ensured a sea of change in telecom and aviation. Though the objectivity to avail electricity looks attractive, but on a close scrutiny, we find there is no substance.

A power ministry official said open access in transmission would bring in comeptition and offer a choice to consumers. He said the ministry would challenge the Karnataka high court order. “The Madras high court order, however, has given a boost to the Centre's efforts to encourage open access by states.”

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 10 2010 | 1:05 AM IST

Next Story