GST Council meeting: Panel for raising threshold for offences to Rs 2 cr

GST Council will also consider a ministerial panel report on setting up GST Appellate Tribunals

GST
GST Council will also take up the group of ministers (GoM) report headed by Haryana deputy chief minister Dushyant Chautala on the Goods and Services tax Appellate Tribunals (GSTAT)
Shrimi Choudhary
2 min read Last Updated : Dec 12 2022 | 11:10 PM IST
The all-powerful GST Council, which is scheduled to meet on December 17, will likely to take up changes in the prosecution provisions under the GST regime, in which a committee of officials has proposed increasing the monetary limit to Rs 2 crore from the current Rs 1 crore, set as a minimum amount of tax evaded for arrest in non-cognizable and bailable offences under the regime. The council will also consider a ministerial panel report on setting up GST Appellate Tribunals, according to the agenda documents reviewed by Business Standard.

At present, if the amount of tax evaded or input tax credit wrongly availed of is Rs 5 crore or above, the prison term may be extended to five years. If the amount evaded exceeds Rs 2 crore (but not more than Rs 5 crore), the jail term could be three years. If tax evaded is over Rs 1 crore but less than Rs 2 crore, the incarceration period is a year.

The GST Council will also take up the report by a group of ministers (GoM) -- headed by Haryana Deputy Chief Minister Dushyant Chautala -- on the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunals (GSTATs).

The GoM report has proposed that each Bench should consist of president, two judicial members, one technical member (Centre) and another technical member (state).

It suggested empowering a single-member Bench to hear cases with tax implications up to Rs 50 lakh.

The report also pitched for a principal Bench in New Delhi and similar Benches at the state level. The appellate body’s president is likely to be a retired judge from the Supreme Court or former chief justice of a high court, the sources said.

States with less than 50-million population should have maximum of 2 Benches and no state should have more than 5 Benches, the report suggested.

Among others, the law committee set up under the GST Council proposed a change in the compounding provision by reducing it to 25 per cent of the tax involved, from the existing 50 per cent, and the maximum amount not being more than 100 per cent.

For example, small businesses with a Rs 5-10-crore turnover may be asked for a lower fee (15-20 per cent) on total tax involved.

Currently, the provision of compounding requires a 50-150 per cent fee.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :Goods and Services TaxGSTFinance Ministrytax evasionGST CouncilGST appellate tribunalCGST actGST collectionsGST Law panelLaw panel

Next Story