According to Citigroup global chief economist Willem H Buiter, the size and the composition of a central bank's balance sheet have serious fiscal implications.
"Because national treasury is the beneficial owner of the central bank, it makes sense to consolidate the single period (instantaneous) budget identities, balance sheets and intertemporal budget constraint (IBC) of the state and of the central bank and work with a consolidated single period budget identity, balance sheet and IBC of the state," he said.
Buiter, the Dutch born American-British economist, was speaking at the 16th C D Deshmukh (RBI's first Indian Governor) memorial lecture on April 11 where media was not allowed.
As per RBI's website, Buiter said at the lecture that the monetary policy of any central bank has an unavoidable fiscal dimension because the fiscal theory of seigniorage is the right way of thinking about the inherent fiscal dimension of monetary policy.
Seigniorage is the profit that a government makes by issuing currency, especially the difference between the face value of coins and their production costs.
Buiter said the national treasury benefits from a central bank's profit or surplus, regardless of its ownership arrangements and irrespective of the degree of operational independence that it may have when it comes to the design and implementation of the monetary policy.
Speaking on the theme of 'The good and the bad fiscal theory of the price level', he said there is no evidence of a central bank of any large economy making losses even though it does not own its balance sheet responsibility.
He said central banking is profitable due to its unique liquidity properties and monetary liabilities coupled with the large deposits it holds for commercial banks.
It can be noted that the Reserve Bank of India had last July transferred Rs 65,876 crore of its surplus as dividend to the government, which was Rs 20 crore less than it had transferred in fiscal 2015 at Rs 65,896 crore.
Unlike the private sector, the state (consolidated central bank and national treasury) is not subject to intertemporal budget constraints while choosing to increase or lower public spending, taxation, monetary issuance and policy rates, Buiter said.
This in normal circumstances leads to the belief that fiscal, financial and monetary policy of the government and central bank will not create any problems of sovereign default and insolvency.
Buiter said though it is true that the state has two unique funding sources -- taxes and seigniorage -- not available to the private sector, it does not mean that the state is not subject to its own IBC.
Also, because the simple logic is that debt cannot grow forever at a higher proportional rate than the interest rate on the debt, he added.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)