The differences have come out clearly in the latest parliamentary committee report on 'The Cigarette and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules, 2014', which recommended that the warning must cover 50 per cent of one side of a pack. The panel said the health ministry's proposal was too harsh and might result in flooding of illicit cigarettes in the market.
The current rules - which came into force in 2008 - mandate a warning on 40 per cent display area on one side of a pack. "The committee observes that whereas it is a standard practice to undertake a consultation process with various stakeholders before carrying out any important policy decision, unfortunately the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare did not appear to have followed this practice while coming out with the amendment Rules of 2014," says the report.
According to the ministry of labour and employment, if the government implements warning on 85 per cent display area of tobacco products, it would have adverse effect on livelihood of millions of people. "The Ministry of Labour has, therefore, come to the conclusion that this issue requires detailed study," says the report.
| WHAT MINISTRIES SAID |
|
Similarly, Rita Teaotia, secretary, ministry of commerce, told the committee that after the introduction of pictorial health warnings on tobacco packages in 2008-09, the consumption of domestic tobacco has not witnessed any decline. Consequently, the commerce ministry told the parliamentary panel that health ministry's step might lead to increase in the illicit trade of cigarettes, besides adversely affecting local growers and manufacturers of tobacco products. The health ministry is planning to impose the new rule from April 1, 2016.
"The recommendations of the committee are excessive and do not appear to have cognised for the devastating consequences of large warnings on the livelihood of millions that are dependent on the tobacco industry," said a spokesperson of Tobacco Institute of India. Agriculture ministry also pointed out that no single crop is as remunerative as tobacco and it is very difficult to persuade tobacco growers to switch to alternate cash crops.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
