He also assured industry that information received under the law or disclosures made during the 'compliance window' would be kept confidential. This was after some industrialists, including Rahul Bajaj, raised a concern that information got under the law could be used by officials to harass the assessee concerned.
At a PHDCCI event here, he said: "The government is open to issuing a further circular, to give clarifications and reduce hardships."
The ministry has released 32 'frequently asked questions' (FAQs) on the new law, compliance window and penalties. There is a 120 per cent penalty, plus taxes, and a jail term, for undeclared wealth or assets abroad after the three-month compliance window ends.
During this period, penalty and taxes combined will be 60 per cent of the value of assets declared, with no jail term, and immunity from certain laws. The window closes in end-September and has so far seem only a single disclosure of undisclosed money abroad, of Rs 70-80 crore.
In a different context, on the revealing of names of nearly 1,200 Indian account holders in Swiss banks, veteran banker Deepak Parekh had on Tuesday said the government should distinguish between legitimate and illicit funds before taking any action.
While the government agrees that the black money law should not be used to harass the assessees who make a declaration, and that the information disclosed should be kept confidential, it wants the law to be harsh. In his Independence Day speech, the Prime Minister Narendra Modi had said, "People complain that we have passed a stringent law,
that officers would harass them…doctors also warn us about the side effects of injections. Similarly, this disease is so serious that if we want a treatment, we will have to also bear the side effects…while bearing the side effects, we are moving forward against black money."
Das reiterated on Friday, saying the problem of black money was not a soft one. Hence, it had to be a stringent law.
The revenue secretary criticised tax amnesty schemes, saying these go against honest payers. The finance ministry has refused to call the compliance window an amnesty scheme, as there is no penalty under any such. He said the earlier experience of the Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme, in 1997, had shown there was a dip in tax collections for a couple of years after such a scheme comes into operation.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)