Virtually restraining the government from demolishing the Adarsh society building during the pendency of a petition challenging the move, the Bombay High Court today said it would like to hear the Society and the environment ministry before passing a “drastic” order for pulling it down.
The breather came just a day before the expiry of the three-month deadline set by the ministry to the society to appeal against its January 16 order for demolition of the 31-storey building for violation of several norms, including those related to coastal zone regulations. “We are assured that the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) would maintain status quo until the court decides the case. Nothing drastic will happen. In case it does, the society can rush to the court immediately,” a division bench of justices Ranjana Desai and R G Ketkar said posting the matter for arguments on April 27.
“Anything which is illegal needs to be demolished. We (court) agree with that but at this stage we would like to first hear the arguments to satisfy our judicial conscience. Demolition is a drastic step,” the judges said while hearing the society’s petition against the demolition order.
They wanted to know if demolition was the only solution or if the building in upmarket Colaba could be put to any other use. “But is demolition the only solution? What is the alternative? Can’t the Society approach the ministry for clearance now as in the case of Lavasa Corporation? Or maybe the building could be put for some other use,” Desai said.
Replying to this, Additional Solicitor General Darius Khambata said if the society wanted clearance now they should say so and approach the ministry with an application.
Khambata, appearing for the ministry, said the society did not take any permission or clearance before construction which started in 2003. “They never came for permission. The building is illegal and needs to be demolished.”
Senior Counsel Mukul Rohatgi, Adarsh’s lawyer, argued the construction was completed several years ago. “All permissions were taken then. How can they (ministry) say now that everything is illegal?”
In a related development, the court has adjourned another petition filed by the society that seeks a direction to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to defreeze its bank accounts till April 26.
CBI, which is conducting a probe into the scam, has attached the society’s bank accounts.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
