The annual GDP growth rate in the 2004-09 period was 8.5 per cent. But, the central statistical office’s GDP growth estimate for the financial year 2012-13 is five per cent.
Jalan said that after the growth has slowed down, the country witnessed many scams too. Bimal Jalan was speaking at a talk hosted here recently.
Also Read
Shankar Acharya, Honorary professor at Indian Council For Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER), said the revenue deficit and fiscal deficit targets for the financial year 2012-13 are not ambitious enough. Shankar Acharya said though the revenue deficit is targeted to decline from 3.9 per cent in the Revised Estimate for 2012-13 to 3.3 per cent next financial year in the budget. This is still three times of the figure (1.05 per cent) in 2007-08, he pointed out.
“The Finance Minister had promised to bring down the fiscal deficit to 4.8 per cent of the GDP, but this is also higher than (3.11 per cent) in 2007-08," he said.
At almost 5.8 per cent (for 2011-12), the Centre's fiscal deficit is among the worst among the BRICS nations. The projection for the current fiscal year is 5.2 per cent in the Revised Estimate.
He said that though no one is against food security, the government’s commitment to the proposed bill in this regard will amplify the long-term problem of entitlement expenditure growth and the containment of subsidies.
He said that in the financial year 2013-14, the economic growth is likely to be lower than 6 percent, the Centre's fiscal deficit near 5 per cent, and the current account deficit around 4 to 5 per cent.
“The policy priorities should be to reduce the growing fiscal deficit, increase the petroleum, oil and fertilizer prices, and slow down on the entitlement programs. The government should resurrect reform through implementation of FDI in retail and other sectors, and push the pending laws on insurance, banking and pension. The government should restore investor confidence through reversing the bad tax measures of 2012-13 budget,” Shankar Acharya said.
Then finance minister Pranab Mukherjee brought retrospective amendments to Income Tax Act and the General Anti-Avoidance Rules (proposed to be implemented from April one, 2014), which evoked harsh criticism from investors.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
