Radiation from cell towers not hazardous: Telecom industry

Industry fears spate of cases against towers, after SC ordered one in Gwalior to be shut down

Tower, Telecom
Megha Manchanda New Delhi
Last Updated : Apr 15 2017 | 9:17 PM IST
The issue of cell phone tower radiation is again haunting the telecom industry, following the Supreme Court’s (SC) direction to shut down  a mobile tower in Gwalior based on a complaint by a petitioner.

Experts feel it is an unwelcome news for the industry. “The court seems unconvinced by the vast data and analysis that suggest that mobile radiation is too weak to break a chemical bond or cause damage to humans,” an independent telecom sector expert said.

The decision will certainly encourage others and start similar litigation. The industry is already struggling on several fronts, including falling revenues as well as the bad press received due to frequent call drops. The court’s decision will disappoint them further, the expert said. The SC on Wednesday ordered shutting down of a mobile tower in Gwalior following a domestic help’s petition, stating the radiations from the towers afflicted him with cancer. 

In a statement, the Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI) said, “For the industry, consumer health and interest are paramount. The industry appeals to the citizens and the public to not panic and read the interim order in its entirety. There are four EMF (electromagnetic)-related cases, which have been clubbed together. There are eight high courts, which have found the radiations emanating from mobile towers are not hazardous.”

The Centre, in its affidavit, has also provided evidence of the same, stating clearly it has one of the strictest norms across the world on EMF emission. The submission by the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) also refers to over 20,000 papers, which does not provide scientific evidence that link mobile towers to any adverse impact. 

As a precaution, the DoT has already maintained emission limits at 1/10th of the recommended ICNIRP (International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection) global standards for India, making them one of  the strictest norms  across  the globe. 

Further, the Allahabad High Court has also instituted an expert committee, which found, currently, there is no conclusive scientific evidence, which establishes that EMF has harmful effects on humans.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Next Story