The Nuclear Liability Bill was today embroiled in a fresh row with BJP and Left objecting to an amendment proposed by a Parliamentary panel on suppliers' obligation in case of an accident but the government sought to allay the apprehensions of opposition parties.
The Union Cabinet meeting scheduled this evening to consider the Bill was postponed till tomorrow, apparently to consider the objections raised by the opposition.
BJP and Left parties raised objections to addition of a word 'and' in the Clause 17 which says that "the operator of a nuclear installation shall have a right to recourse where -- (A) such right is expressly provided for in a contract in writing".
The parties fear that insertion of the word dilutes the obligations on the suppliers of equipment in case of a nuclear accident.
Government, on its part, sought to allay apprehensions over the recommendations of the Standing Committee, saying all concerns would be addressed.
"I assure my friends in BJP and Left that we have already taken their concerns on board. If there are any concerns, there are some concerns that have been raised today, all those concerns will be addressed in all seriousness," Minister of State in PMO Prithviraj Chavan told reporters.
"Wait till the amendments are brought to Parliament," he said when his attention was drawn to objections raised over the amendments.
The report of Standing Committee on Science and Technology, which examined the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Bill 2010, proposed that the Clause 17(A) may end with word 'and'.
It also proposed modification of Clause 17(b) to say "the nuclear incident has resulted as a consequence of latent or patent defect, supply of sub-standard material, defective equipment or services or from the gross negligence on the part of the supplier of the material, equipment or services".
BJP, which had agreed with Congress on changes in the Bill, shot off a note to the government, saying clubbing of Clause 17(A) and (B) dilutes provisions relating to the liability of suppliers.
BJP said adding 'and' was not discussed at the Standing Committee or at the meetings the opposition leaders had with Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee.
BJP contended the "efficacy and utility of Clause 17 (b) on the supplier is completely destroyed by the supplier not agreeing to an agreement in writing. Thus, what Clause 17(b) gives as a protection to the operator, the word 'and' snatches it away".
The BJP note, handed over to Minister of State for Science and Technology Prithviraj Chavan by party leader Arun Jaitley, said "since the nuclear power plants are to be operated only by the government or government companies, it would be to our own advantage to delete the word 'and'."
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
