A five-judge bench of the Supreme Court today decided to refer to a larger bench the issue of imposition of entry tax on goods coming into jurisdiction of the respective states, involving financial implications to the tune of Rs 30,000 crore.
"We are referring it to a larger bench to decide the issue," the bench headed by Justice S H Kapadia said. The bench said that the Chief Justice of India would form a larger bench to decide the issue.
The bench was dealing with a batch of over 2,000 petitions, filed by the state governemnts and companies across the country, challenging orders of various high courts giving conflicting judgements on the issue, which involved financial implications to the tune of Rs 30,000 crore.
A bench headed by apex court Justice Arijit Pasayat (since retired) had referred the matter to a larger bench after which the five-judge bench was constituted.
Many companies had challenged the Madhya Pradesh High Court decision upholding the state government's right to levy tax on raw materials and packaging of goods used in the manufacture of the finished products at rates higher than those prescribed under the Entry Tax Act.
The High Court had upheld the validity of the 'Madhya Pradesh Sthaniya Kshetra Me Mal Ke Pravesh Par Kar Adhiniyam' of 1976, an amendment of it in 2004 and the Entry Tax Act of 2006 on grounds that the levy, being "compensatory in nature", was immune from the challenge.
The companies had contended that as the tax in question was ad valorem in nature, it cannot be compensatory because there can be no relation between the levy based on the value of goods coming into the state for consumption or use and the trading facilities purportedly proposed to be provided to traders.
Along with appeals from Madhya Pradesh, the apex court also referred appeals from Orissa to the larger bench.
The Orissa government had moved petitions against big firms, including Reliance Industries, Bharti Airtel, Tata Refractories, Hindalco Industries and others, challenging the Orissa High Court ruling that the levy of entry tax under the Orissa Entry Tax Act, 1999 was unconstitutional.
A batch of cross appeals were also filed by Tata Sponge Iron Ltd, Vedanta Aluminium, Bhushan Steel & Strips and others challenging the imposition of entry tax on the goods entering the state.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
