In a bid to rationalise natural gas prices, a Spanish consultant has suggested pooling or averaging out rates of the fuel supplied to sectors like power and fertiliser for a uniform rate for all plants across the country irrespective of the source.
Marcados Energy Market Pvt Ltd, appointed to recommend rationalising multiple natural gas prices, in its final report stated that pooling of gas consumed by sensitive power and fertiliser sectors was the "most suited" option.
Gas is now sold at rates between $1 and $5.73 per million British thermal units, depending on the source.
It said sectoral averaging out of prices was better than a general cost-based pool covering all consuming sectors and all suppliers that could be achieved only through legislation.
Sectoral pooling "would serve the basic objectives without being heavy on administrative arrangements and cost", the report said. "It would also facilitate an eventual migration to competitive markets."
At present, the government fixes the price of gas produced from blocks given on nomination to state-run Oil and Natural Gas Corp (ONGC) and Oil India (OIL), while for others it is determined in line with production sharing contracts.
Gas from fields given to ONGC and OIL on nomination basis was sold at about $1.8 per mmBtu, while in the North-east it was priced at $1-1.2 per mmBtu. Prices range from $3.5-5.73 per mmBtu for areas given out prior to New Exploration and Licensing Policy (NELP) of 1999, while gas from Reliance Industries' eastern offshore KG D6 field is priced at $4.20 per mmBtu.
The consultant suggested pooling or averaging out all prices to power and fertiliser sectors so that consumers get gas at the same price irrespective of the source. "We believe that the sectoral pool option would leave sufficient room for price discovery for new gas supplies."
Marcados said sectoral pooling would not require legislative changes "instead...(it) could work through a simpler policy directive".
The consultant was against pooling of gas transportation tariff. "We have examined the issue, but have found it to be inefficient and distortionary. It can also result in stranded assets that would prevent efficient gas market development."
"Instead, we favour the idea of co-ordinated pipeline development across the country, and charging of tariffs for pipeline use on a rational economic basis," the report said.
It recommended creation of a roadmap for migration to competitive wholesale markets for gas.
"We believe that this will lead to eventual reduction in the price of gas imports by India, and aid the process of the country becoming a major player in the international gas market," the report added.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
