Statsguru: Sorting out farmers' incomes

Reportedly, Bibek Debroy suggested to tax agricultural income, which led to a public outcry

Click on picture for details
Click on picture for details
Ishan Bakshi New Delhi
Last Updated : May 09 2017 | 3:08 PM IST
Over the past few days, India’s agriculture has received much public attention for two apparently contradictory concerns. The first issue was the possibility of taxing agricultural income. NITI Aayog member Bibek Debroy reportedly suggested this move for widening the tax base and pruning exemptions. However, this led to a massive public outcry and within a few days both the NITI Aayog and ministry of finance ruled out such a move. Beyond the political economy though, the data show such a tax would rope in a very small fraction of farmers into the tax net.

Chart 1 maps the distribution of agricultural households by the size of land possessed and an overwhelming number of farm households have tiny land holdings.




Source: Income, Expenditure, Productive Assets and Indebtedness of Agricultural Households in India NSSO

Chart 2 shows that, even if taxed, given the existing tax slabs, incomes from such small holdings will merit an exemption.




Source: Income, Expenditure, Productive Assets and Indebtedness of Agricultural Households in India NSSO

Chart 3 reiterates this point by mapping the average annual income of the farm households.  

 


Source: Income, Expenditure, Productive Assets and Indebtedness of Agricultural Households in India NSSO

The second issue was about the government’s promise to double farmers’ incomes by 2022. But achieving a doubling of incomes in real, not nominal, terms could be rather challenging. Recent estimates by another NITI Aayog member, Ramesh Chand, paint a bleak picture.

Chart 4 shows that in real terms, farmers’ incomes have been stagnant. Moreover, while they have been growing in nominal terms, the rate of growth has decelerated. So what can be done?



Source: Doubling farmers income, Ramesh Chand, 2017
Note: Click on the legend to see various data.
 

Chart 5 tries to provide some clues. It contrasts the growth rate of each sub-component and compares it with what is needed to achieve a doubling of incomes. The task becomes relatively less arduous when it is broken down. 
 

Source: Doubling farmers income, Ramesh Chand, 2017

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Next Story