HC sets aside Sushilkumar Shinde's caste certificate

The court, however, referred Shinde's case back to the Caste Scrutiny Committee which would decide on it afresh

Sushilkumar Shinde
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Mar 28 2014 | 7:33 PM IST

Don't want to miss the best from Business Standard?

The Bombay High Court has set aside a caste validity certificate issued to Union Home Minister Sushilkumar Shinde in 2009 on the ground that the scrutiny committee in Maharashtra had not passed a reasoned order as required under the law.

The court, however, referred Shinde's case back to the Caste Scrutiny Committee which would decide on it afresh.

The bench also directed Shinde to appear before the committee in March-end and asked the latter to decide his claim for issuance of a caste certificate as expeditiously as possible, preferably within two months from the date he appears before it.

Also Read

"We direct the caste scrutiny committee to hold an inquiry in accordance with law, if necessary, by calling for report of the Vigilance Cell," said the bench in a recent order.

The vigilance committee is expected to hold an inquiry by speaking to the family members, neighbours, community members and school authorities of the applicant/claimant.

The court, however, made it clear that it was not making any adjudication on merits of the caste claim of Shinde. "All contentions on merits are kept open," it observed.

The order was passed by a bench headed by Justice Abhay Oka on a petition filed by Pramod Gaikwad who had challenged the caste certificate issued to Shinde, saying it was invalid in law.

Gaikwad's lawyer Helen Mandlik questioned the lack of mandatory reasoning in the caste certificate issued to Shinde by the scrutiny committee. She argued it was bad in law as guidelines had not been followed.

Disposing of the petition, the court agreed with Gaikwad and sent Shinde's caste claim files back to the scrutiny committee for considering it afresh.

Satish Maneshinde, Shinde's counsel, argued a fresh inquiry may be ordered in a time-bound schedule.

This plea was allowed by the court which asked the scrutiny committee to decide the claim within 60 days.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 28 2014 | 6:48 PM IST

Next Story