A cap on borrowing by non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) from banks may strengthen the financial system. According to a study by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), non-deposit taking NBFCs would lead to more systemic risks, owing to their reliance on banks for funding needs.
“As a policy, when NBFCs are discouraged from raising public deposits, these become non-deposit taking, while increasingly substituting public deposits with borrowings from the banking system,” the working paper said. Hence, there seems to be scope to fix a separate ceiling for ND (non-deposit taking) NBFCs to borrow from the banking system, the study added.
Non-banking financial companies heavily depend on banks for meeting their funding needs, as many of these are not allowed to raise deposits. However, by borrowing through banks, these indirectly use public deposits, on a much larger scale than by raising deposits on their own.
The study also said due to high inter-connectedness, the vulnerability of the financial system may increase due to high inter-dependability. “There is a possibility that chains of inter-connectedness can make the system more vulnerable to shocks in any market, or at any single larger institution,” the RBI working paper said.
While both banks and NBFCs would be impacted if either of these sectors are hit, the impact on NBFCs would be much greater. “Even at the slightest symptom of a crisis or a crisis-like situation, NBFCs can face pressure of withdrawal from banks, similar to the one encountered from mutual funds immediately after the Lehman Brothers episode,” the study said.
Also, with tighter capital adequacy norms, banks may lend less or may completely stop lending to the sector in extreme cases.
“Banks may either become too reluctant to lend to NBFCs or in an extreme case, these may completely refrain from lending to NBFCs, which would further precipitate the situation. Any strain in the normal chain would compel NBFCs to turn to the money market with higher costs to wade over the tight liquidity conditions, thus disturbing the money market as well,” the paper said.
Apart from suggesting a cap on the borrowing limit of ND-NBFCs from banks, the working paper also suggested NBFCs should diversify their sources of funds.
“NBFCs’ future growth depends, to a large extent, on the success these achieve in diversification of sources of funds,” it said.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
