CCI dismisses unfair practices complaint against 4 credit rating agencies

CCI dismissed a complaint alleging that Crisil, India Ratings, Care Ratings, and ICRA indulged in unfair business practices

CCI
Competition Commission of India (CCI)
Press Trust of India New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Dec 29 2020 | 7:04 PM IST

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) on Tuesday dismissed a complaint alleging that CRISIL Ltd, India Ratings and Research Pvt Ltd, CARE Ratings Ltd and ICRA Ltd indulged in unfair business practices.

The ruling came on a complaint filed by Brickwork Ratings India Pvt Ltd.

The informant, Brickwork Ratings, alleged that the opposite parties -- CRISIL, India Ratings and Research, CARE Ratings and ICRA -- contravened the provisions of the Competition Act by means of collusive bidding and bid rigging, and also indulged in below cost predatory pricing.

Brickwork Ratings averred that the credit rating agencies are involved in anti-competitive practices in contravention of the provisions of the Competition Act which is causing an appreciable adverse effect on the competition in India as well as on the Indian economy, CCI said in an order.

Brickwork Ratings asked the the Commission to order "investigation into formation of cartel and collusive bidding by the opposite parties in the tender processes of various PSUs for the period 2009 till date."

It alleged that in a 2019-20 tender invited by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) to rate its upcoming Rs 75,000 crore bond issuances, the credit rating agencies cartelised and quoted identical/similar rates.

As per the informant, the quotes clearly showed price parallelism between the opposite parties.

Brickwork Ratings also gathered information regarding tenders floated by various other public sector undertakings (PSUs) and alleged that the quotes of opposite parties evidenced bid rigging amongst themselves, it said.

After taking into consideration the submission of various parties, the Commission said that there exists "no prima facie case" of contravention of the provisions of the Competition Act.

CCI noted that there are certain other allegations about the opposite parties indulging in mala fide and illegal conduct.

"In the opinion of the Commission, such allegations made by the informant are too broad and general in nature and do not raise any competition concern," CCI said.

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :Competition Commission of IndiaCrisilICRACARE RatingsIndia Ratings

First Published: Dec 29 2020 | 6:57 PM IST

Next Story